Strain and grain size of TiO2 nanoparticles from TEM, Raman spectroscopy and XRD: The revisiting of the Williamson-Hall plot method

[Display omitted] •First revision of the Williamson-Hall βcosθ-sinθ plot to β2cos2θ-sinθ and βcos2θ-sinθ.•The β2cos2θ-sinθ overestimates crystallite size when compares to HRTEM sizes.•The new βcos2θ-sinθ plot improves strain approaching the Raman standard.•The new βcos2θ-sinθ plot is the same as the...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Results in physics Vol. 9; pp. 628 - 635
Main Authors:	Kibasomba, Pierre M., Dhlamini, Simon, Maaza, Malik, Liu, Chuan-Pu, Rashad, Mohamed M., Rayan, Diaa A., Mwakikunga, Bonex W.
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Elsevier B.V 01-06-2018 Elsevier
Subjects:	Crystallite Particle Scherrer Size Strain Williamson-Hall Particle Crystallite Williamson-Hall Scherrer Size Strain
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	[Display omitted] •First revision of the Williamson-Hall βcosθ-sinθ plot to β2cos2θ-sinθ and βcos2θ-sinθ.•The β2cos2θ-sinθ overestimates crystallite size when compares to HRTEM sizes.•The new βcos2θ-sinθ plot improves strain approaching the Raman standard.•The new βcos2θ-sinθ plot is the same as the HRTEM on crystallite size.•The new βcos2θ-sinθ plot is better than W-H and Scherrer methods on crystallite size. The Williamson-Hall (W-H) equation, which has been used to obtain relative crystallite sizes and strains between samples since 1962, is revisited. A modified W-H equation is derived which takes into account the Scherrer equation, first published in 1918, (which traditionally gives more absolute crystallite size prediction) and strain prediction from Raman spectra. It is found that W-H crystallite sizes are on average 2.11 ± 0.01 times smaller than the sizes from Scherrer equation. Furthermore the strain from the W-H plots when compared to strain obtained from Raman spectral red-shifts yield factors whose values depend on the phases in the materials – whether anatase, rutile or brookite. Two main phases are identified in the annealing temperatures (350 °C–700 °C) chosen herein – anatase and brookite. A transition temperature of 550 °C has been found for nano-TiO2 to irreversibly transform from brookite to anatase by plotting the Raman peak shifts against the annealing temperatures. The W-H underestimation on the strain in the brookite phase gives W-H/Raman factor of 3.10 ± 0.05 whereas for the anatase phase, one gets 2.46 ± 0.03. The new βtot2cos2θ-sinθ plot and when fitted with a polynomial yield less strain but much better matching with experimental TEM crystallite sizes and the agglomerates than both the traditional Williamson-Hall and the Scherrer methods. There is greater improvement in the model when linearized – that is the βtotcos2θ-sinθ plot rather than the βtot2cos2θ-sinθ plot.
ISSN:	2211-3797 2211-3797
DOI:	10.1016/j.rinp.2018.03.008