1078 Randomized comparison of Etoposide-Cisplatin vs Etoposide-Carboplatin and irradiation in small cell lung cancer (SCLC): Evaluation of long term survival
Between 2/88 and 5/91, 143 patients (pts) with SCLC (82 extensive and 61 limited disease) were randomized to receive Cisplatin and Etoposide (PE) or Carboplatin and Etoposide (CE). Responders, received concurrently with the 3rd cycle of chemotherapy chest irradiation, while CR's received additi...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of cancer (1990) Vol. 31; pp. S22 - S23 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier Ltd
01-11-1995
|
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Between 2/88 and 5/91, 143 patients (pts) with SCLC (82 extensive and 61 limited disease) were randomized to receive Cisplatin and Etoposide (PE) or Carboplatin and Etoposide (CE). Responders, received concurrently with the 3rd cycle of chemotherapy chest irradiation, while CR's received additionally prophylactic cranial irradiation. No statistically significant difference was observed in the response and survival between the two groups (Sem. Oneal. 21:23–30,1994, suppl.6). A recent analysis oflong term survival pts, showed that 10 pts of the PE group and 9 of the CE group lived more than 2 years. Patients were similarly stratified according to the stage of the disease, PS, sodium, alkaline phosphatase and albumin.
Response
CR
Survival (months)
TTl (months)
PE
90%
80%
45.7 (28.1–69.0)
43.90 (4–69)
CE
100%
67%
48.4 (27.6–76.7)
23.48 (3–77)
None of the above differences was found to be statistically significant. Eleven pts have died so far from SCLC and I pt from NSCLC respectively. Seven pts (5 PE, 2 CE) are still alive from 42+ to 77+ months.
In conclusion it appears that the less toxic Carboplatin is at least equally effective to Cisplatin as far as it concerns response, duration of responses and long term survival, in pts with SCLC. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0959-8049 1879-0852 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0959-8049(95)95352-7 |