Diagnosing and recording root caries: A survey among Swiss dentists

Despite the increase in the root caries prevalence, little is still known about how dentists manage this condition. The present study aimed to evaluate the knowledge of dentists on diagnosing and recording root caries lesions (RCL). The survey consisted of three domains: (1) dentists’ knowledge on d...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Journal of dentistry Vol. 142; p. 104870
Main Authors:	Wierichs, Richard Johannes, Kaspari, Isabelle, Maniewicz, Sabrina, Campus, Guglielmo, Tennert, Christian, Carvalho, Thiago Saads, Niemeyer, Samira Helena
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	England Elsevier Ltd 01-03-2024
Subjects:	Diagnosis Education Management Non-invasive treatment Questionnaire Root caries Root caries Non-invasive treatment Questionnaire Management Diagnosis Education
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Despite the increase in the root caries prevalence, little is still known about how dentists manage this condition. The present study aimed to evaluate the knowledge of dentists on diagnosing and recording root caries lesions (RCL). The survey consisted of three domains: (1) dentists’ knowledge on diagnosing, recording and managing RCL; (2) information about their current general clinical routines; and (3) their demographics. The four Swiss Universities distributed the survey via e-mail lists for alumni or professionals participating in continuing education. The data was quality checked. Construct validity, internal reliability and intraclass correlation (ICC) were assessed. The survey was answered by 383 dentists from 25(out of 26) cantons [mean(SD) working experience: 22.5(12) years]. The majority replied that they see less than 5 patients with RCL per week, whereas 41 have at least 5 per week, and 40 % (157 dentists) do not distinguish RCL from coronal caries in their patients’ medical records. When diagnosing active RCL, tactile sensation was the most predominant criterion (n = 380), whereas color (n = 224) and visual appearance (n = 129) of the lesion were less often selected. The most often chosen risk factors for RCL were poor oral hygiene and presence of biofilm.The responses were significantly influenced by the participants’ place of education, their age and working area. The present survey highlights the huge diversity in diagnosing, recording and assessing risk factors of RCL. The benefits of an appropriate diagnosis, recording and management of risk factors of RCL should be highlighted in under- and postgraduate dental education. A great diversity in diagnosing, recording and assessing risk factors of RCL was observed, which migh strongly impact how dentists manage RCL. The study emphasizes the necessity for intensive efforts to bridge the gap between guideline recommendations and their implementation in private dental practices.
Bibliography:	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23
ISSN:	0300-5712 1879-176X
DOI:	10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104870