Search Results - "Journal of clinical epidemiology"

The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews by Page, Matthew J., McKenzie, Joanne E., Bossuyt, Patrick M., Boutron, Isabelle, Hoffmann, Tammy C., Mulrow, Cynthia D., Shamseer, Larissa, Tetzlaff, Jennifer M., Akl, Elie A., Brennan, Sue E., Chou, Roger, Glanville, Julie, Grimshaw, Jeremy M., Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn, Lalu, Manoj M., Li, Tianjing, Loder, Elizabeth W., Mayo-Wilson, Evan, McDonald, Steve, McGuinness, Luke A., Stewart, Lesley A., Thomas, James, Tricco, Andrea C., Welch, Vivian A., Whiting, Penny, Moher, David

“…The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers…”
Get full text

Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement by Page, Matthew J, McKenzie, Joanne E, Bossuyt, Patrick M, Boutron, Isabelle, Hoffmann, Tammy C, Mulrow, Cynthia D, Shamseer, Larissa, Tetzlaff, Jennifer M, Moher, David

“…To describe the processes used to update the PRISMA 2009 statement for reporting systematic reviews, present results of a survey conducted to inform the…”
Get full text

Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews by Garritty, Chantelle, Gartlehner, Gerald, Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara, King, Valerie J., Hamel, Candyce, Kamel, Chris, Affengruber, Lisa, Stevens, Adrienne

“…To develop methods guidance to support the conduct of rapid reviews (RRs) produced within Cochrane and beyond, in response to requests for timely evidence…”
Get full text

A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models by Christodoulou, Evangelia, Ma, Jie, Collins, Gary S., Steyerberg, Ewout W., Verbakel, Jan Y., Van Calster, Ben

“…The objective of this study was to compare performance of logistic regression (LR) with machine learning (ML) for clinical prediction modeling in the…”
Get full text

The proportion of missing data should not be used to guide decisions on multiple imputation by Madley-Dowd, Paul, Hughes, Rachael, Tilling, Kate, Heron, Jon

“…Researchers are concerned whether multiple imputation (MI) or complete case analysis should be used when a large proportion of data are missing. We aimed to…”
Get full text

GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence by Schünemann, Holger J., Cuello, Carlos, Akl, Elie A., Mustafa, Reem A., Meerpohl, Jörg J., Thayer, Kris, Morgan, Rebecca L., Gartlehner, Gerald, Kunz, Regina, Katikireddi, S Vittal, Sterne, Jonathan, Higgins, Julian PT, Guyatt, Gordon

“…To provide guidance on how systematic review authors, guideline developers, and health technology assessment practitioners should approach the use of the risk…”
Get full text

Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study by Hong, Quan Nha, Pluye, Pierre, Fàbregues, Sergi, Bartlett, Gillian, Boardman, Felicity, Cargo, Margaret, Dagenais, Pierre, Gagnon, Marie-Pierre, Griffiths, Frances, Nicolau, Belinda, O’Cathain, Alicia, Rousseau, Marie-Claude, Vedel, Isabelle

“…The mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) was developed for critically appraising different study designs. This study aimed to improve the content validity of…”
Get full text

CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document by Riley, David S, Barber, Melissa S, Kienle, Gunver S, Aronson, Jeffrey K, von Schoen-Angerer, Tido, Tugwell, Peter, Kiene, Helmut, Helfand, Mark, Altman, Douglas G, Sox, Harold, Werthmann, Paul G, Moher, David, Rison, Richard A, Shamseer, Larissa, Koch, Christian A, Sun, Gordon H, Hanaway, Patrick, Sudak, Nancy L, Kaszkin-Bettag, Marietta, Gagnier, Joel J, Carpenter, James E

“…Abstract Background Well-written and transparent case reports (1) reveal early signals of potential benefits, harms, and information on the use of resources;…”
Get full text

PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement by McGowan, Jessie, Sampson, Margaret, Salzwedel, Douglas M, Cogo, Elise, Foerster, Vicki, Lefebvre, Carol

“…Abstract Objective To develop an evidence-based guideline for Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS) for systematic reviews (SRs), health…”
Get full text

A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study by Clark, Justin, Glasziou, Paul, Del Mar, Chris, Bannach-Brown, Alexandra, Stehlik, Paulina, Scott, Anna Mae

“…Systematic reviews (SRs) are time and resource intensive, requiring approximately 1 year from protocol registration to submission for publication. Our aim was…”
Get full text

ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed by Whiting, Penny, Savović, Jelena, Higgins, Julian P.T, Caldwell, Deborah M, Reeves, Barnaby C, Shea, Beverley, Davies, Philippa, Kleijnen, Jos, Churchill, Rachel

“…Abstract Objective To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather than in primary studies). Study Design and Setting…”
Get full text

Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis by Brignardello-Petersen, Romina, Bonner, Ashley, Alexander, Paul E., Siemieniuk, Reed A., Furukawa, Toshi A., Rochwerg, Bram, Hazlewood, Glen S., Alhazzani, Waleed, Mustafa, Reem A., Murad, M. Hassan, Puhan, Milo A., Schünemann, Holger J., Guyatt, Gordon H.

“…This article describes conceptual advances of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) working group guidance to evaluate…”
Get full text

Logistic regression was as good as machine learning for predicting major chronic diseases by Nusinovici, Simon, Tham, Yih Chung, Chak Yan, Marco Yu, Wei Ting, Daniel Shu, Li, Jialiang, Sabanayagam, Charumathi, Wong, Tien Yin, Cheng, Ching-Yu

“…To evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms and to compare them with logistic regression for the prediction of risk of cardiovascular…”
Get full text

Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension by McGowan, Jessie, Straus, Sharon, Moher, David, Langlois, Etienne V., O'Brien, Kelly K., Horsley, Tanya, Aldcroft, Adrian, Zarin, Wasifa, Garitty, Chantelle Marie, Hempel, Susanne, Lillie, Erin, Tunçalp, Ӧzge, Tricco, Andrea C.

“…Reporting guidelines are knowledge translation tools created by experts to help ensure transparency and completeness of reporting—with the overarching goal to…”
Get full text

Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how by Synnot, Anneliese, Turner, Tari, Simmonds, Mark, Akl, Elie A., McDonald, Steve, Salanti, Georgia, Meerpohl, Joerg, MacLehose, Harriet, Hilton, John, Tovey, David, Shemilt, Ian, Hilton, John, Akl, Elie, Pestridge, Charlotte, Horsley, Tanya, Armstrong, Rebecca, Plovnick, Robert, Arno, Anneliese, Au, Agnes, Johnston, Renea, Rada, Gabriel, Bagg, Matthew, Jones, Arwel, Ravaud, Philippe, Boden, Catherine, Kahale, Lara, Richter, Bernt, Boisvert, Isabelle, Keshavarz, Homa, Ryan, Rebecca, Brandt, Linn, Kolakowsky-Hayner, Stephanie A., Salama, Dina, Brazinova, Alexandra, Nagraj, Sumanth Kumbargere, Salanti, Georgia, Buchbinder, Rachelle, Lasserson, Toby, Santaguida, Lina, Champion, Chris, Lawrence, Rebecca, Schünemann, Holger J., Charidimou, Andreas, Leucht, Stefan, Shemilt, Ian, Low, Nicola, Sherifali, Diana, Churchill, Rachel, MacLehose, Harriet, Simmonds, Mark, Cossi, Marie-Joelle, Counotte, Michel, Marshall, Iain, Soares-Weiser, Karla, Craigie, Samantha, Marshall, Rachel, Srikanth, Velandai, Martin, Nicole, Martínez García, Laura, Danko, Kristen, Taylor, Mark, Donoghue, Emma, Maxwell, Lara J., Thayer, Kris, Dressler, Corinna, McAuley, James, Thomas, James, Tritton, Roger, Elliott, Julian, McKenzie, Joanne, Tsafnat, Guy, Meerpohl, Joerg, Tugwell, Peter, Merner, Bronwen, Featherstone, Robin, Mondello, Stefania, Foxlee, Ruth, Morley, Richard, van Valkenhoef, Gert, Munafo, Marcus, Gerrity, Martha, Munn, Zachary, Wallace, Byron, Glasziou, Paul, Murano, Melissa, Wallace, Sheila A., Newman, Kristine, Watts, Chris, Nieuwlaat, Robby, Gurusamy, Kurinchi, Nikolakopoulou, Adriani, Weigl, Aaron, Hartling, Lisa, Wiercioch, Wojtek, Wolfenden, Luke, Pahwa, Manisha, Yepes Nuñez, Juan José, Yost, Jennifer, Hill, Sophie, Pearson, Leslea

“…Systematic reviews are difficult to keep up to date, but failure to do so leads to a decay in review currency, accuracy, and utility. We are developing a novel…”
Get full text

The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence by Hultcrantz, Monica, Rind, David, Akl, Elie A, Treweek, Shaun, Mustafa, Reem A, Iorio, Alfonso, Alper, Brian S, Meerpohl, Joerg J, Murad, M Hassan, Ansari, Mohammed T, Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal, Östlund, Pernilla, Tranæus, Sofia, Christensen, Robin, Gartlehner, Gerald, Brozek, Jan, Izcovich, Ariel, Schünemann, Holger, Guyatt, Gordon

“…Abstract Objective To clarify the GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation) definition of certainty of evidence and suggest…”
Get full text

GRADE Guidelines 28: Use of GRADE for the assessment of evidence about prognostic factors: rating certainty in identification of groups of patients with different absolute risks by Foroutan, Farid, Guyatt, Gordon, Zuk, Victoria, Vandvik, Per Olav, Alba, Ana Carolina, Mustafa, Reem, Vernooij, Robin, Arevalo-Rodriguez, Ingrid, Munn, Zachary, Roshanov, Pavel, Riley, Richard, Schandelmaier, Stefan, Kuijpers, Ton, Siemieniuk, Reed, Canelo-Aybar, Carlos, Schunemann, Holger, Iorio, Alfonso

“…The objective of this study was to provide guidance on the use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to…”
Get full text

Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting by Colquhoun, Heather L, Levac, Danielle, O'Brien, Kelly K, Straus, Sharon, Tricco, Andrea C, Perrier, Laure, Kastner, Monika, Moher, David

“…Abstract Objectives The scoping review has become increasingly popular as a form of knowledge synthesis. However, a lack of consensus on scoping review…”
Get full text

Framework for the treatment and reporting of missing data in observational studies: The Treatment And Reporting of Missing data in Observational Studies framework by Lee, Katherine J., Tilling, Kate M., Cornish, Rosie P., Little, Roderick J.A., Bell, Melanie L., Goetghebeur, Els, Hogan, Joseph W., Carpenter, James R.

“…Missing data are ubiquitous in medical research. Although there is increasing guidance on how to handle missing data, practice is changing slowly and…”
Get full text

GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables by Schünemann, Holger J., Mustafa, Reem A., Brozek, Jan, Steingart, Karen R., Leeflang, Mariska, Murad, Mohammad Hassan, Bossuyt, Patrick, Glasziou, Paul, Jaeschke, Roman, Lange, Stefan, Meerpohl, Joerg, Langendam, Miranda, Hultcrantz, Monica, Vist, Gunn E., Akl, Elie A., Helfand, Mark, Santesso, Nancy, Hooft, Lotty, Scholten, Rob, Rosen, Måns, Rutjes, Anne, Crowther, Mark, Muti, Paola, Raatz, Heike, Ansari, Mohammed T., Williams, John, Kunz, Regina, Harris, Jeff, Rodriguez, Ingrid Arévalo, Kohli, Mikashmi, Guyatt, Gordon H.

“…This article provides updated GRADE guidance about how authors of systematic reviews and health technology assessments and guideline developers can rate the…”
Get full text