Search Results - "Jørgensen, Susanne Fogh"

  • Showing 1 - 8 results of 8
Refine Results
  1. 1

    Screening participation after a false positive result in organized cervical cancer screening: a nationwide register-based cohort study by Larsen, Pernille Thordal, Jørgensen, Susanne Fogh, Tranberg, Mette, Njor, Sisse Helle

    Published in Scientific reports (22-09-2020)
    “…Our aim was to investigate whether receiving a false positive (FP) cervical cytology result affected subsequent cervical cancer screening participation. This…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  2. 2

    Value of a catch-up HPV test in women aged 65 and above: A Danish population-based nonrandomized intervention study by Tranberg, Mette, Petersen, Lone Kjeld, Hammer, Anne, Elfström, Miriam, Blaakær, Jan, Jørgensen, Susanne Fogh, Bennetsen, Mary Holten, Jensen, Jørgen Skov, Andersen, Berit

    Published in PLoS medicine (06-07-2023)
    “…High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) test is replacing cytology as the primary cervical cancer screening test due to superior sensitivity, but in most…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  3. 3

    Adherence to follow-up and resource use after abnormal FIT-screening: Evaluation of the Danish colorectal cancer screening program by Jørgensen, Susanne Fogh, Larsen, Pernille Thordal, Erichsen, Rune, Andersen, Berit, Rebolj, Matejka, Njor, Sisse

    Published in Endoscopy International Open (01-05-2024)
    “…Abstract Background and study aims The effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening programs depends on adherence to surveillance protocols for…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  4. 4

    Gaps between recommendations and their implementation: A register-based study of follow-up after abnormalities in cervical cancer screening by Jørgensen, Susanne Fogh, Andersen, Berit, Rebolj, Matejka, Njor, Sisse Helle

    Published in Preventive medicine (01-05-2021)
    “…Follow-up after screen-detected abnormalities is crucial for the success of cervical cancer screening programs but is usually not closely monitored in official…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  5. 5

    Comparisons of assessment pathways after abnormal mammography screening in Denmark, Norway, and Spain by Jørgensen, Susanne Fogh, Sagstad, Silje, Louro, Javier, Román, Marta, Castells, Xavier, Hofvind, Solveig, Njor, Sisse

    Published in Breast cancer research and treatment (01-05-2024)
    “…Purpose To ensure high-quality screening programmes and effective utilization of resources, it is important to monitor how cancer detection is affected by…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  6. 6

    Variations in pathways and resource use in follow-up after abnormal mammography screening: a nationwide register-based study by Jørgensen, Susanne Fogh, Andersen, Berit, Lernevall, Anders, Rebolj, Matejka, Njor, Sisse Helle

    Published in Breast cancer research and treatment (01-09-2021)
    “…Purpose Mammography screening reduces breast cancer mortality, but a successful screening programme depends on both high participation and a sufficient…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  7. 7

    Colorectal cancer screening participation among citizens not recommended to be screened: a cohort study by Larsen, Pernille Thordal, Jørgensen, Susanne Fogh, Njor, Sisse Helle

    Published in BMC gastroenterology (20-05-2022)
    “…Guidelines on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommend screening of average-risk adults only. In addition, screening of individuals with active inflammatory…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  8. 8

    Choice of Assessment and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer among Women with False-Positive Mammography Screening by Sardini, Bayan, Fogh Jørgensen, Susanne, Brønsro Larsen, Lisbet, Elhakim, Mohammad Talal, Njor, Sisse Helle

    Published in Cancers (20-03-2023)
    “…Women with false-positive mammography screening results have a two- to four-fold higher risk of breast cancer. This study aimed to investigate if the…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article