Changes in Central Venous Catheter Use in the Hematology Unit with the Introduction of Ultrasound Guidance and a Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter

Objective A central venous catheter (CVC) is often needed to treat hematologic diseases, but it is accompanied by many complications. Ultrasound guidance (USG) or a peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) can reduce such complications. Meterials We collected data of patients with attemp...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Internal Medicine Vol. 60; no. 17; pp. 2765 - 2770
Main Authors:	Utsu, Yoshikazu, Masuda, Shinichi, Watanabe, Reiko, Arai, Hironori, Nakamura, Ayako, Matsui, Shinichirou, Izumi, Shintarou, Aotsuka, Nobuyuki
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Tokyo The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine 01-09-2021 Japan Science and Technology Agency
Subjects:	Blood diseases Catheters central venous catheter complication hematologic disease Hematological diseases Hematology Internal medicine Original peripherally inserted catheter Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasound ultrasound guidance
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Objective A central venous catheter (CVC) is often needed to treat hematologic diseases, but it is accompanied by many complications. Ultrasound guidance (USG) or a peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) can reduce such complications. Meterials We collected data of patients with attempted CVC placement in our hematology unit in 2012 (before introduction of USG and PICC) and 2018 (after introduction) and compared both periods. Results In total, 187 CVC insertions were attempted in 2018 and 198 in 2012. USG was used 154 times (82%) in 2018 and 4 times (2%) in 2012 (p<0.001). The success rates of insertion were 95% in 2018 and 89% in 2012 (p=0.063). The incidence of acute complications was 4.3% in 2018 and 9.1% in 2012 (p=0.069). The incidence of CVC removal owing to delayed complications was 26% in 2018 and 21% in 2012 (p=0.327). The sites of approach in 2018 and 2012 were the internal jugular in 42 (22%) and 54 (27%), subclavian in 52 (28%) and 128 (65%), brachial (PICC) in 89 (48%) and 14 (7%), and femoral in 4 (2%) and 2 (1%), respectively (p<0.001). Conclusion USG has become commonplace since its introduction. The landmark-based subclavian approach was largely replaced by PICC with USG in 2018. USG and PICC can help improve success rates and safety profiles.
Bibliography:	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Correspondence to Dr.　Yoshikazu Utsu, yutsu@naritasekijyuji.jp
ISSN:	0918-2918 1349-7235
DOI:	10.2169/internalmedicine.7119-21