Early versus Delayed Initiation of Oral Feeds among Mothers after Caesarean Delivery: A Comparative Study

Introduction: It is a common practice to keep a patient ‘nil’ per oral, till the return of bowel sounds, after any laparotomy. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) society, now recommends evidenced-based guidelines for postoperative early oral feeding after an uncomplicated Caesarean Delivery (CD)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical and diagnostic research Vol. 16; no. 12; pp. QC01 - QC04
Main Authors: Saxena, Rajiv Kumar, Indrani, Chaitanya, Roshini, P, Maji, Aritra
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 01-12-2022
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction: It is a common practice to keep a patient ‘nil’ per oral, till the return of bowel sounds, after any laparotomy. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) society, now recommends evidenced-based guidelines for postoperative early oral feeding after an uncomplicated Caesarean Delivery (CD), as opposed to the delayed (conventional) initiation of oral feeds. Aim: To compare the effects of early feeding versus delayed oral feeding in women undergoing CD. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted in Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at MVJ Medical College and Research Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, from November 2020 to October 2021. Total of 148 women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy undergoing CD, under spinal anaesthesia, were allocated into two groups. Early Feeding group (n=70) (EF) where feeding was started within 2-8 hours of surgery and Delayed feeding group (n=78) (DF) where feeding was started between 18-24 hours of CD. The outcome measures were maternal satisfaction, and the effect on gastrointestinal function (return of bowel sounds, passage of flatus and stool), mobilisation of patient and complications in postoperative period. Student’s t-test and Chi-square test were used as appropriate, and p-value <0.05 was determined to be statistically significant. Results: The mean age of women in DF was 24.79±4.37 years and in EF group was 25.09±3.86 years. Overall, the maternal satisfaction was high in both the groups; DF (80%) and in EF (98.57%). There was an early return of bowel sounds in EF group 4.71±1.83 hours versus 13.72±3.08 hours in DF group. Participants in EF group recorded. early passage of flatus (9.89±3.00 hours versus 13.72±3.08 hours), and early ambulation (9.57±1.62 versus 14.95±3.9 hours) when compared to DF group participants. Conclusion: The ERAS strategy is a safe and effective approach for postoperative care for women undergoing caesarean delivery and results in overall high patient satisfaction.
ISSN:2249-782X
0973-709X
DOI:10.7860/JCDR/2022/59075.17193