A review of policies on the involuntary use of psychotropic medications among persons experiencing incarceration in the United States

A review of policies on the involuntary use of psychotropic medications among persons experiencing incarceration in the United States

Background In Harper v. Washington (1990), the United States Supreme Court established the right of states to involuntary medicate incarcerated individuals in emergency situations without a court order. The extent to which states have implemented this in correctional facilities has not been well cha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health & justice Vol. 11; no. 1; p. 9
Main Authors: Orta, Joana, Barton, Catherine, Ilao, Patricia, Apollonio, Dorie E.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 18-02-2023
Springer Nature B.V
BMC
Subjects:
Antipsychotic
Community and Environmental Psychology
Corrections
Criminology and Criminal Justice
Imprisonment
Law and Criminolgy
Mental health
Mental health care
Policy
Prisoners
Prisons
Psychotropic drugs
Public Health
Qualitative research
Research Article
Social Policy
United States
United States > US
Policy
United States
Psychotropic
Mental health
Antipsychotic
Corrections
Prisoners
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background In Harper v. Washington (1990), the United States Supreme Court established the right of states to involuntary medicate incarcerated individuals in emergency situations without a court order. The extent to which states have implemented this in correctional facilities has not been well characterized. This exploratory qualitative study sought to identify state and federal corrections policies relating to involuntary psychotropic medication for individuals who are incarcerated and classify them by scope. Methods State Department of Corrections (DOC) and Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) policies relating to mental health, health services, and security were collected between March and June 2021 and coded using Atlas.ti software. The primary outcome was whether states allowed emergency involuntary use of psychotropic medications; secondary outcomes pertained to use of restraint and “use of force” policies. Results Of the 35 states plus the Federal BOP that made policies publicly available, 35 out of 36 (97%) allowed the involuntary use of psychotropic medications in emergency situations. The extent of detail contained in these policies varied, with 11 states providing minimal information to guide use. One state (3%) did not allow public review of “use of restraint” policies, and 7 states (19%) did not allow public review of “use of force” policies. Conclusions More explicit criteria for emergency involuntary use of psychotropic medications are needed to better protect individuals who are incarcerated, and states should provide more transparency regarding use of restraint and use of force in corrections.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2194-7899
2194-7899
DOI:10.1186/s40352-023-00204-1