A new simplified one port laparoscopic technique of peritoneal dialysis catheter placement with intra-abdominal fixation

Various laparoscopic techniques have been described for the insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheters. However, most use 3 to 4 ports, thus multiplying the potential risk for abdominal wall complications (hemorrhage, hernia, leaking). A Tenckhoff catheter was placed laparoscopically, using just 1 p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of surgery Vol. 192; no. 1; pp. 125 - 129
Main Authors: Harissis, Haralampos V., Katsios, Christos S., Koliousi, Elli L., Ikonomou, Margarita G., Siamopoulos, Konstantinos C., Fatouros, Michalis, Kappas, Angelos M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01-07-2006
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Various laparoscopic techniques have been described for the insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheters. However, most use 3 to 4 ports, thus multiplying the potential risk for abdominal wall complications (hemorrhage, hernia, leaking). A Tenckhoff catheter was placed laparoscopically, using just 1 port, in 13 consecutive patients with end-stage renal failure. All catheters were fixed in the abdominal cavity with no additional ports for this purpose. After a follow-up of 76 patient-months, all catheters are working properly. There were no postoperative wall hemorrhages, early leaking, or hernias. There was 1 case of catheter migration and 2 cases of late leaking in 2 patients in total, due to severe constipation. There were no exit site or tunnel infections. One episode of peritonitis was successfully treated with antibiotics. The simplicity and the rapidity of the method justifies serious consideration for its use as the standard Tenckhoff catheter placement.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.033