Age-specific size of the normal adenoid pad on magnetic resonance imaging
Conclusions regarding the significance and appearance of the adenoids incidentally noted on magnetic resonance (MR) scans of the brain largely rely on observations of previously published plain film data. In order to determine the age specific appearance of normal adenoid tissue as measured on sagit...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical otolaryngology Vol. 25; no. 5; pp. 392 - 395 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Science Ltd
01-10-2000
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Conclusions regarding the significance and appearance of the adenoids incidentally noted on magnetic resonance (MR) scans of the brain largely rely on observations of previously published plain film data. In order to determine the age specific appearance of normal adenoid tissue as measured on sagittal T1‐weighted midline MR images, we evaluated 189 patients without a history or clinical evidence of adenoid disease, who were sequentially referred for an MR scan of the brain. The thickness of the adenoid pad was measured to the nearest 1 mm along a line through the pharyngeal tubercle constructed perpendicular to the anterior clival surface. Patients were grouped according to age. Normal subjects demonstrated an age specific variation in the size of the pad with the maximal size being attained in early childhood and then steadily decreasing in later childhood and adulthood (P = 0.0001). The adenoids were largest in the 7–10 years age group (mean, 14.59 mm) and steadily declined to 4.83 mm by 60 years of age. Previous surgery had no effect on adenoid measurement (P = 0.582). Magnetic resonance scans provide an excellent method for assessing the adenoid pad. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:8400E837303C86EB3A85B11901F99CB1A0674AFB ArticleID:COA381 ark:/67375/WNG-T50VG31S-V The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the US Department of Defence. This manuscript was presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Head and Neck Radiology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 15 May 1997. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0307-7772 1749-4478 1365-2273 1749-4486 |
DOI: | 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2000.00381.x |