Effect of Riluzole on Spinal Cord Regeneration with Hemisection Method Before Injury

The pathophysiology of spinal cord injury (SCI) with the information obtained to date has not been elucidated fully. A safe drug or treatment protocol that results in cell regeneration for SCI remains unknown. Neuroprotective and neuroregenerative effects of riluzole, administered after a SCI, have...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World neurosurgery Vol. 114; pp. e247 - e253
Main Authors: Caglar, Yusuf Sukru, Demirel, Altan, Dogan, Ihsan, Huseynov, Ramis, Eroglu, Umit, Ozgural, Onur, Cansiz, Cevriye, Bahadir, Burak, Kilinc, Mustafa Cemil, Al-Beyati, Eyyub S.M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-06-2018
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The pathophysiology of spinal cord injury (SCI) with the information obtained to date has not been elucidated fully. A safe drug or treatment protocol that results in cell regeneration for SCI remains unknown. Neuroprotective and neuroregenerative effects of riluzole, administered after a SCI, have been shown in experimental studies. This study aimed to investigate the effect of riluzole on neural regeneration in a rat SCI model. Thirty-two rats were divided into 8 groups, with 4 rats in each group. Hemisection method was performed after T7–T9 laminectomy. Rats were intraperitoneally aministered with riluzole (6 mg/kg). Locomotor recovery of the rats was assessed at 1 day, and 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after the 21-point Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan test. Subsequently, the spinal cords of the rats were scored according to a semiquantitative grading system using a light microscope, and the numbers of myelinated axons, neurons, and glial cells were calculated. Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan test changes were statistically significant when groups 4–6 and 8 were compared with the other groups (P < 0.05, P < 0.00625). The results of the numbers of neurons, glial cells, and myelinated axons were statistically significant. Especially group 8, in which riluzole was administered 5 days before injury, more positive clinical and histopathologic results were obtained. Riluzole treatment is more effective when provided before injury. Riluzole may contribute to functional recovery when used in the preoperative period in patients who are at a high risk for permanent neurologic deficit. •Riluzole treatment is more effective before injury.•Positive clinical results were obtained in groups given riluzole before injury.•Recurrent riluzole application increases neuroregeneration.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1878-8750
1878-8769
DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.171