Pilot of urgent care center evaluation for acute coronary syndrome

Patients with chest pain and concern for potential coronary ischemia are frequently referred to the emergency department (ED), resulting in substantial resource utilization and cost. The objective of this study was to implement a protocol for urgent care center (UCC) evaluation of potential acute co...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	The American journal of managed care Vol. 25; no. 5; pp. e160 - e164
Main Authors:	Radecki, Ryan P, Foley, Kevin F, Elzinga, Timothy S, Horak, Cynthia P, Gant, Thomas E, Papp, Heather M, Morris, Adam J, Hauser, Natalie R, Ertz-Berger, Briar L
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	United States MultiMedia Healthcare Inc 01-05-2019
Subjects:	Acute Coronary Syndrome - complications Acute Coronary Syndrome - economics Acute Coronary Syndrome - therapy Acute coronary syndromes Adult Ambulatory Care - economics Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data Chest Pain - etiology Clinical outcomes Emergency medical care Emergency Service, Hospital - economics Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data Female Health administration Health Services Accessibility - economics Health Services Accessibility - statistics & numerical data Health Services Misuse - economics Health Services Misuse - statistics & numerical data Hospitalization Humans Ischemia Male Middle Aged Referral and Consultation - economics Retrospective Studies Time Factors
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Patients with chest pain and concern for potential coronary ischemia are frequently referred to the emergency department (ED), resulting in substantial resource utilization and cost. The objective of this study was to implement a protocol for urgent care center (UCC) evaluation of potential acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and describe its performance. This is a descriptive, retrospective review of consecutive cases included in a protocol for UCC evaluation of ACS. Consecutive patient encounters from 4 urgent care facilities of our regional integrated health system were reviewed from a period spanning 4.5 months of the 2017 calendar year. The primary outcome was avoidance of an ED visit within 30 days of the index visit, and the primary safety outcome was serious adverse events (AEs) occurring in the UCC setting. There were 802 patients evaluated, with a median age of 55 years, and 58% were female. Seventy-three (9.1%) patients were referred to the ED or hospitalized for any reason at the index visit, 10 (1.2%) of whom were ultimately diagnosed with ACS. Within 30 days, 56 (7.7%) of the remaining 729 patients had ED visits or hospitalization for any reason, 2 (0.2%) of whom received a diagnosis of ACS. Overall, 673 (83.9%) patients were managed without any ED visit. No serious AEs were recorded. Our initial pilot data demonstrate the feasibility of an outpatient UCC evaluation for ACS without refuting the underlying premise of safety.
Bibliography:	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23
ISSN:	1088-0224 1936-2692