Maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with PCOS: comparison of different diagnostic definitions
STUDY QUESTION Does the prevalence of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes vary in women diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) according to different definitions? SUMMARY ANSWER A comparison of different criteria revealed that there is a substantial risk for perinatal complications in PC...
Saved in:
Published in: | Human reproduction (Oxford) Vol. 30; no. 10; pp. 2396 - 2403 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
Oxford University Press
01-10-2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | STUDY QUESTION
Does the prevalence of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes vary in women diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) according to different definitions?
SUMMARY ANSWER
A comparison of different criteria revealed that there is a substantial risk for perinatal complications in PCOS women, regardless of the used definition.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
Pregnant women with PCOS are susceptible to perinatal complications. At present, there are three main definitions for PCOS. So far, we are aware of only one study, which found that the elevated risk for complications varied widely depending on the different phenotypes and features but only considered a relatively small sample size for some of the phenotypes.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
Retrospective matched cohort study.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
Data of primiparous women with PCOS according to ESHRE/ASRM 2003 criteria and healthy controls giving birth to neonates ≥500 g were included. A total of 885 women were analysed: out of 177 women with PCOS, 85 (48.0%) met the National Institutes of Health (NIH) 1990 criteria, another 14 (7.9%) featured the additional phenotypes defined by The Androgen Excess and PCOS Society (AE-PCOS) 2006 criteria, 78 (44.1%) were classified as PCOS exclusively by the ESHRE/ASRM 2003 definition, and 708 represented the control group.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
The prevalence of adverse maternal (49.4 versus 64.3 versus 60.3%, P = 0.313) and neonatal (27.1 versus 35.7 versus 23.1%, P = 0.615) outcomes did not differ within the three PCOS groups (ESHRE/ASRM, NIH, AE-PCOS, respectively). Compared with healthy controls, the risk for maternal complications was increased in PCOS patients [odds ratio (OR) 2.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.82–3.64; P < 0.001] while there was no difference in neonatal complications (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.56–1.21; P = 0.343).
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
A limitation of our study is its retrospective design and the relatively small sample size, particularly in the AE-PCOS subgroup.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
Since women with PCOS have, regardless of the used definition, a high risk of maternal and neonatal complications they should be informed and advised to follow regular checks in units where problems can be detected early to allow specialized care.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
Marietta Blau Grant (Austrian Agency for International Cooperation in Education and Research; OeAD-GmbH) and mobility scholarship (Medical University of Graz). |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0268-1161 1460-2350 |
DOI: | 10.1093/humrep/dev187 |