Does liberalisation of cannabis policy influence levels of use in adolescents and young adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis
ObjectivesTo examine the effect of cannabis policy liberalisation (decriminalisation and legalisation) levels of use in adolescents and young adults.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Inclusion criteriaIncluded studies were conducted among individuals younger than 25 years and quantitatively...
Saved in:
| Published in: | BMJ open Vol. 9; no. 7; p. e025880 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
England
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
10-07-2019
BMJ Publishing Group |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | ObjectivesTo examine the effect of cannabis policy liberalisation (decriminalisation and legalisation) levels of use in adolescents and young adults.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Inclusion criteriaIncluded studies were conducted among individuals younger than 25 years and quantitatively assessing consequences of cannabis policy change. We excluded articles: (A) exclusively based on participants older than 25 years; (B) only reporting changes in perceptions of cannabis use; (C) not including at least two measures of cannabis use; (D) not including quantitative data; and (E) reviews, letters, opinions and policy papers. PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and Web of Science were searched through 1 March 2018.Data extraction and synthesisTwo independent readers reviewed the eligibility of titles and abstracts and read eligible articles, and four authors assessed the risk of bias (Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies). Extracted data were meta-analysed. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO.Results3438 records were identified via search terms and four via citation lists; 2312 were retained after removal of duplicates, 99 were assessed for eligibility and 41 were included in our systematic review. 13 articles examined cannabis decriminalisation, 20 examined legalisation for medical purposes and 8 examined legalisation for recreational purposes. Findings regarding the consequences of cannabis decriminalisation or legalisation for medical purposes were too heterogeneous to be meta-analysed. Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest a small increase in cannabis use among adolescents and young adults following legalisation of cannabis for recreational purposes (standardised mean difference of 0.03, 95% CI −0.01 to –0.07). Nevertheless, studies characterised by a very low/low risk of bias showed no evidence of changes in cannabis use following policy modifications.ConclusionsCannabis policy liberalisation does not appear to result in significant changes in youths’ use, with the possible exception of legalisation for recreational purposes that requires monitoring.Trial registration numberCRD42018083950. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 PMCID: PMC6624043 |
| ISSN: | 2044-6055 2044-6055 |
| DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025880 |