Spectral Discrimination of Common Karoo Shrub and Grass Species Using Spectroscopic Data

Rangelands represent about 25% of the Earth’s land surface but are under severe pressure. Rangeland degradation is a gradually increasing global environmental problem, resulting in temporary or permanent loss of ecosystem functions. Ecological rangeland studies aim to determine the productivity of r...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 16; no. 20; p. 3869
Main Authors:	Harmse, Christiaan Johannes, van Niekerk, Adriaan
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Basel MDPI AG 01-10-2024
Subjects:	Accuracy Aerial surveys Assessments Cameras Carbon dioxide Classification Degradation Drone aircraft Ecological function Ecologists Ecosystems Environmental degradation Feature selection Flowers & plants Grasses hyperspectral remote sensing Imagery Machine learning Plant species plant species discrimination Productivity Range ecology rangeland management Rangelands Remote sensing Satellites Scientific equipment and supplies industry Sensors Species Species classification UAV-based remote sensing Unmanned aerial vehicles Vegetation Visual discrimination Wavelengths United States South Africa Karoo
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Rangelands represent about 25% of the Earth’s land surface but are under severe pressure. Rangeland degradation is a gradually increasing global environmental problem, resulting in temporary or permanent loss of ecosystem functions. Ecological rangeland studies aim to determine the productivity of rangelands as well as the severity of their degradation. Rigorous in situ assessments comprising visual identification of plant species are required as such assessments are perceived to be the most accurate way of monitoring rangeland degradation. However, in situ assessments are expensive and time-consuming exercises, especially when carried out over large areas. In situ assessments are also limited to areas that are accessible. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of multispectral (MS) and hyperspectral (HS) remotely sensed, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based data and machine learning (random forest) methods to differentiate between 15 dominant Nama Karoo plant species to aid ecological impact surveys. The results showed that MS imagery is unsuitable, as classification accuracies were generally low (37.5%). In contrast, much higher classification accuracies (>70%) were achieved when the HS imagery was used. The narrow bands between 398 and 430 nanometres (nm) were found to be vital for discriminating between shrub and grass species. Using in situ Analytical Spectral Device (ASD) spectroscopic data, additional important wavebands between 350 and 400 nm were identified, which are not covered by either the MS or HS remotely sensed data. Using feature selection methods, 12 key wavelengths were identified for discriminating among the plant species with accuracies exceeding 90%. Reducing the dimensionality of the ASD data set to the 12 key bands increased classification accuracies from 84.8% (all bands) to 91.7% (12 bands). The methodology developed in this study can potentially be used to carry out UAV-based ecological assessments over large and inaccessible areas typical of Karoo rangelands.
ISSN:	2072-4292 2072-4292
DOI:	10.3390/rs16203869