Investigating eighth-grade students’ lexical creativity in writing argumentative text in Indonesian language classroom

Linguistic creativity has been a research topic and has been studied extensively for decades in second language, foreign language, or bilingual contexts. Nonetheless, how it is used in formal Indonesian as an L1 classroom seems to be underresearched. Thus, this study explores students’ linguistic cr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Indonesian journal of applied linguistics Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 173 - 183
Main Authors: Sastromiharjo, Andoyo, Hardianto, Daris
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 31-05-2024
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Linguistic creativity has been a research topic and has been studied extensively for decades in second language, foreign language, or bilingual contexts. Nonetheless, how it is used in formal Indonesian as an L1 classroom seems to be underresearched. Thus, this study explores students’ linguistic creativity at the lexical level in composing argumentative texts with student self-selected topics. The research included 12 eighth-grade students’ self-selected topics in argumentative texts analyzed using qualitative content analysis. In analyzing the data, linguistic creativity at the lexical level based on Zawada’s (2006) taxonomy includes formal lexical creativity, semantic lexical creativity, syntagmatic lexical choice, and paradigmatic lexical choice. The study found that the students deployed different lexical creativity strategies in the argumentative text, and the most frequent lexical creativity was formal lexical creativity, followed by paradigmatic lexical choice, semantic lexical creativity, and syntagmatic lexical. Thus, the study suggests that Indonesian eighth-grade students are quite adept at manipulating word forms, and they may benefit from expanding the use of different lexical strategies to deliver their messages, especially in building their arguments.
ISSN:2301-9468
2502-6747
DOI:10.17509/ijal.v14i1.71342