Mobilization of Fluids in the Intensive Treatment of Primary and Secondary Lymphedemas
Background. Lymphedema is a clinical condition resulting from the accumulation of macromolecules in the interstitial space with a consequent buildup of fluids. Aim. The objective of this study was to compare the therapeutic response to treatment that mobilizes fluids between primary and secondary ly...
Saved in:
Published in: | TheScientificWorld Vol. 2018; no. 2018; pp. 1 - 4 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cairo, Egypt
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2018
Hindawi John Wiley & Sons, Inc Hindawi Limited |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background. Lymphedema is a clinical condition resulting from the accumulation of macromolecules in the interstitial space with a consequent buildup of fluids. Aim. The objective of this study was to compare the therapeutic response to treatment that mobilizes fluids between primary and secondary lymphedemas. Method. Thirty-three patients with severe leg lymphedema who underwent intensive treatment for five consecutive days in 2013 and 2014 at the Clínica Godoy were evaluated in a prospective clinical trial. Diagnosis was based on the patient’s history and physical examination. Treatment consisted of eight hours/day of Mechanical Lymphatic Therapy using an electromechanical device (RAGodoy®) that performs plantar flexion and extension associated with 15 minutes of Cervical Lymphatic Therapy, a technique developed by Godoy and Godoy that involves stimulation in the cervical region and a grosgrain compression stocking alternated with elastic bandages. The unpaired t -test and Fisher’s exact test were used for statistical analysis with an alpha error of 5% ( p value < 0.05) being considering acceptable. Secondary lymphedema was more prevalent in women (Fisher exact test p value < 0.01). Results. The age of patients with secondary lymphedema was greater than those with primary lymphedema (unpaired t -test: p value < 0.03). The mean volume losses were 64.62% and 48.35% for the patients with secondary and primary lymphedema, respectively ( p value < 0.03). Conclusion. Women are more prevalent and older in the secondary lymphedema group. Volumetric reductions below the knee are faster with intensive treatment for secondary rather than for primary lymphedema. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Academic Editor: Francesco Giallauria |
ISSN: | 2356-6140 1537-744X 1537-744X |
DOI: | 10.1155/2018/6537253 |