Advanced non-small cell lung cancer chemotherapy: a randomized trial of two active regimens (MVP and PE)
The treatment of advanced or metastatic NSCLC remains a controversial issue and cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is by far the most common treatment. Two of these cisplatin-based standard combinations, MVP and PE, were compared in this study in order to evaluate their response rates and surv...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cancer letters Vol. 119; no. 2; pp. 241 - 247 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Shannon
Elsevier Ireland Ltd
11-11-1997
Elsevier |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The treatment of advanced or metastatic NSCLC remains a controversial issue and cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is by far the most common treatment. Two of these cisplatin-based standard combinations, MVP and PE, were compared in this study in order to evaluate their response rates and survival times. Eighty-five previously untreated NSCLC patients were randomly selected to receive either MVP or PE and 72 of these patients were eligible for evaluation for response rate and survival. Response rates for MVP were: CR 11%, PR 35%, SD 19% and PD 35% and for PE: CR 0%, PR 26%. SD 22% and PD 52%. The median survival time was 9.7 months for MVP and 6.9 months for PE. Both schedules were well tolerated. The administration of MVP in advanced NSCLC resulted in superior response rates and survival times over those produced by PE. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0304-3835 1872-7980 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0304-3835(97)00301-7 |