A meta-analysis of the effects of cognitive therapy in depressed patients
Background. Cognitive therapy (CT) has been studied in 78 controlled clinical trials from 1977 to 1996. Method. The meta-analysis used Hedges and Olkin d+ and included 48 high-quality controlled trials. The 2765 patients presented non-psychotic and non-bipolar major depression, or dysthymia of mild...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of affective disorders Vol. 49; no. 1; pp. 59 - 72 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
01-04-1998
Elsevier |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background. Cognitive therapy (CT) has been studied in 78 controlled clinical trials from 1977 to 1996.
Method. The meta-analysis used Hedges and Olkin d+ and included 48 high-quality controlled trials. The 2765 patients presented non-psychotic and non-bipolar major depression, or dysthymia of mild to moderate severity.
Results. At post-test CT appeared significantly better than waiting-list, antidepressants (
P<0.0001) and a group of miscellaneous therapies (
P<0.01). But, CT was equal to behaviour therapy. As between-trial homogeneity was not met, the comparisons of CT with waiting-list or placebo, and other therapies should be taken cautiously. In contrast, between-trial homogeneity was high for the comparisons of CT with behaviour therapy and antidepressants. A review of eight follow-up studies comparing CT with antidepressants suggested that CT may prevent relapses in the long-term, while relapse rate is high with antidepressants in naturalistic studies.
Conclusion. CT is effective in patients with mild or moderate depression. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0165-0327 1573-2517 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0165-0327(97)00199-7 |