A meta-analysis of the effects of cognitive therapy in depressed patients

Background. Cognitive therapy (CT) has been studied in 78 controlled clinical trials from 1977 to 1996. Method. The meta-analysis used Hedges and Olkin d+ and included 48 high-quality controlled trials. The 2765 patients presented non-psychotic and non-bipolar major depression, or dysthymia of mild...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of affective disorders Vol. 49; no. 1; pp. 59 - 72
Main Authors: Gloaguen, Valérie, Cottraux, Jean, Cucherat, Michel, Ivy-Marie Blackburn
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01-04-1998
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background. Cognitive therapy (CT) has been studied in 78 controlled clinical trials from 1977 to 1996. Method. The meta-analysis used Hedges and Olkin d+ and included 48 high-quality controlled trials. The 2765 patients presented non-psychotic and non-bipolar major depression, or dysthymia of mild to moderate severity. Results. At post-test CT appeared significantly better than waiting-list, antidepressants ( P<0.0001) and a group of miscellaneous therapies ( P<0.01). But, CT was equal to behaviour therapy. As between-trial homogeneity was not met, the comparisons of CT with waiting-list or placebo, and other therapies should be taken cautiously. In contrast, between-trial homogeneity was high for the comparisons of CT with behaviour therapy and antidepressants. A review of eight follow-up studies comparing CT with antidepressants suggested that CT may prevent relapses in the long-term, while relapse rate is high with antidepressants in naturalistic studies. Conclusion. CT is effective in patients with mild or moderate depression.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0165-0327
1573-2517
DOI:10.1016/S0165-0327(97)00199-7