Comparative Assessment of Sludge Pre‐Treatment Techniques to Enhance Sludge Dewaterability and Biogas Production

Comparative Assessment of Sludge Pre‐Treatment Techniques to Enhance Sludge Dewaterability and Biogas Production

Effectiveness of ultrasonication, microwave technologies, and enzyme addition prior to anaerobic digestion is investigated using sludge samples taken from the secondary settling tank of a domestic wastewater treatment plant to improve methane production, enhance dewaterability characteristics of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clean : soil, air, water Vol. 46; no. 1
Main Authors: Tas, Didem Okutman, Yangin‐Gomec, Cigdem, Olmez‐Hanci, Tugba, Arikan, Osman A., Cifci, Deniz I., Gencsoy, Elif B., Ekdal, Alpaslan, Ubay‐Cokgor, Emine
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Weinheim Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-01-2018
Subjects:
Anaerobic digestion
Anaerobic processes
Anaerobic treatment
Biogas
Compactibility
Digestion
Domestic wastewater
Enzymes
Methane
microwave
Pretreatment
Raw sludge
Sludge
Sludge digestion
sludge minimization
Sludge treatment
Suction
Suspended particulate matter
Suspended solids
ultrasonication
Ultrasound
Wastewater
Wastewater treatment
Wastewater treatment plants
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Effectiveness of ultrasonication, microwave technologies, and enzyme addition prior to anaerobic digestion is investigated using sludge samples taken from the secondary settling tank of a domestic wastewater treatment plant to improve methane production, enhance dewaterability characteristics of the sludge, and to reduce excess sludge. Microwave pre‐treatment (1500 W, 10 min at 175 °C) results in better extra digester performance (compared to the control reactor) in terms of methane production (25 m3 ton−1 suspended solids (SS)) than ultrasound (no improvement) and enzyme pre‐treatment (11 m3 ton−1 SS). While methane production is not improved as a result of ultrasonication pre‐treatment (15 000 kJ kg−1 SS), a noticeable increase (19%) is observed in the case of microwave pre‐treatment. Higher compactibility values are obtained after ultrasonication and microwave application compared to the control (i.e., from 7.1 to 8.7 and 9.2%, respectively) before anaerobic digestion. Although ultrasonication and microwave application decrease the dewaterability of the raw sludge (capillary suction time (CST) from 827 to 1364 and 2290 s, respectively), similar dewaterability results are obtained at the end of the anaerobic digestion process for all pre‐treated sludge samples. An economic assessment of this study shows that pre‐treatment with microwave results in more than 10‐fold less net cost compared to the enzyme application. Sludge pre‐treatment techniques may help to solve sludge‐associated problems instead of looking for an alternative post‐treatment. Microwave pre‐treatment (1500 W, 10 min at 175 °C) results in better digester performance, compared to a control reactor, in terms of methane production (25 m3 ton−1 SS) than ultrasound (no improvement) and enzyme pre‐treatment (11 m3 ton−1 SS). Pre‐treatment with microwave increases total methane production by 19%.
ISSN:1863-0650
1863-0669
DOI:10.1002/clen.201700569