CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 125 in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant pancreatic diseases with or without jaundice

Background and Objectives In this study, the value of the serum tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA 19‐9, and CA 125 was assessed in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant pancreatic diseases with and without obstructive jaundice. Methods Serum levels of CEA, CA 19‐9, and CA...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Journal of surgical oncology Vol. 95; no. 2; pp. 142 - 147
Main Authors:	Duraker, Nüvit, Hot, Semih, Polat, Yücel, Höbek, Anil, Gençler, Nur, Urhan, Nuray
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01-02-2007
Subjects:	acute pancreatitis Biomarkers, Tumor - blood CA-125 Antigen - blood CA-19-9 Antigen - blood Carcinoembryonic Antigen - blood chronic pancreatitis diagnosis Diagnosis, Differential Humans Immunoradiometric Assay Jaundice, Obstructive - complications pancreatic cancer Pancreatic Diseases - complications Pancreatic Diseases - diagnosis Pancreatic Neoplasms - diagnosis Pancreatitis - diagnosis Prospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity tumor marker
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Background and Objectives In this study, the value of the serum tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA 19‐9, and CA 125 was assessed in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant pancreatic diseases with and without obstructive jaundice. Methods Serum levels of CEA, CA 19‐9, and CA 125 were measured by immunoradiometric assay before the treatment in 123 patients with pancreatic carcinoma and 58 patients with a benign pancreatic disease. Results The sensitivity of CEA, CA 19‐9, and CA 125 in the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma was 39.0%, 81.3%, and 56.9%; and specificity was 91.4%, 75.9%, and 77.6%, respectively. Although there was no significant difference between the CA 19‐9 positivity ratios of the jaundiced (84.3%) and nonjaundiced (73.5%) patient subgroups of the pancreatic carcinoma, this ratio was significantly higher in the jaundiced subgroup (64.7%) than the nonjaundiced subgroup (7.3%) of the benign pancreatic diseases (P < 0.001). The CEA and CA 125 positivity ratios of jaundiced and nonjaundiced subgroups of patients with benign and malignant pancreatic diseases were not significantly different. Conclusions In the differential diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma from benign pancreatic diseases, CA 19‐9 can be useful in the nonjaundiced patients, whereas CA 125 provides a limited contribution in jaundiced patients. J. Surg. Oncol. 2007;95:142–147. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:	ark:/67375/WNG-BVK6M5J9-6 istex:EB8CDCAB94DA002340986BB282A7D37B643FF8A7 ArticleID:JSO20604 Scientist Assistant Professor ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23
ISSN:	0022-4790 1096-9098
DOI:	10.1002/jso.20604