Therapists' and clients' ratings of real relationship, attachment, therapist self-disclosure, and treatment progress

Objective: While there has been much research on the role of the working alliance in psychotherapy, researchers only recently began investigating the role of the real relationship in treatment. Methods: In the current study on therapist and client dyads, we used actor-partner interdependence modelin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychotherapy research Vol. 29; no. 5; pp. 594 - 606
Main Authors: Fuertes, Jairo N., Moore, Michael, Ganley, Jennifer
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Routledge 03-09-2019
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: While there has been much research on the role of the working alliance in psychotherapy, researchers only recently began investigating the role of the real relationship in treatment. Methods: In the current study on therapist and client dyads, we used actor-partner interdependence modeling (APIM) to examine associations between therapists' and clients' ratings of the real relationship, therapist self-disclosure, attachment, and treatment progress. APIM analyses allowed for an examination into how therapists' and clients' views of a particular phenomenon might affect their own ratings (actor), as well as the others' (partner) ratings of that same phenomenon. Results: Significant negative associations between therapist self-reported attachment anxiety and avoidance and therapist-rated real relationship and treatment progress. Significant positive associations were found between client-rated real relationship and client-rated treatment progress. These results and others are discussed in the context of the literature along with implications for future research in this area.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1050-3307
1468-4381
DOI:10.1080/10503307.2018.1425929