Differences in imaging biomarkers between patients with intermediate and advanced non-neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the University of Colorado AMD registry

Purpose To quantify and compare the different prevalence rates of specific retinal imaging biomarkers in patients with intermediate AMD (iAMD) and advanced non-neovascular AMD (nnAMD). Methods Cross-sectional study of patients with iAMD and advanced nnAMD. Imaging studies were reviewed for qualitati...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	European journal of ophthalmology
Main Authors:	Lisker-Cervantes, Andres, Gill, Zafar, Gnanaraj, Ramya, Rajeswaren, Vivian, Mehta, Nihaal, Gange, Bill, Patnaik, Jennifer L, Lynch, Anne M, Palestine, Alan G, Mathias, Marc, Manoharan, Niranjan, Mandava, Naresh, de Carlo Forest, Talisa E
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	09-05-2024
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Purpose To quantify and compare the different prevalence rates of specific retinal imaging biomarkers in patients with intermediate AMD (iAMD) and advanced non-neovascular AMD (nnAMD). Methods Cross-sectional study of patients with iAMD and advanced nnAMD. Imaging studies were reviewed for qualitative imaging biomarkers. Choroidal thickness measurements were obtained subfoveally and in 1000 um and 2000 um intervals away from the fovea. The Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare rates of imaging biomarkers among the two cohorts. P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results 376 eyes of 197 patients with iAMD and 187 eyes of 97 patients with advanced nnAMD were recruited. There were significantly lower rates of the following imaging biomarkers in the iAMD compared with the advanced nnAMD cohorts: soft drusen (66.0% vs. 84.2%, p = 0.001), calcified drusen (4.3% vs. 40.0%, p < 0.0001), RPD (26.2% vs. 53.3%, p < 0.0001), ORT (0.5% vs. 46.9%, p < 0.0001), RP (1.1% vs. 46.3%, p < 0.0001), pigment migration (53.2% vs. 100%, p < 0.0001), and iRORA (17.9% vs. 80.2%, p < 0.0001). In the iAMD cohort, choroidal thickness was significantly greater at 188 µm (SD: 60) and 194 µm (SD: 69), compared to the advanced nnAMD with measurements of 153 µm (SD: 68), and 161 µm (SD: 76). This difference was statistically significant ( p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0002). Conclusions Our results highlight significant differences in imaging biomarkers between both cohorts. Key biomarkers, such as iRORA, RPD, pigment migration, and thinner choroidal thickness, were associated with advanced nnAMD. Identifying these biomarkers early may help target patients who could benefit from new treatments, potentially delaying vision loss.
ISSN:	1120-6721 1724-6016
DOI:	10.1177/11206721241255156