Newcastle disease vaccination in captive-bred wild birds
The breeding of wild birds in captivity assumes an increasingly important role in conservation due to the loss of species and their habitats. Providing the environmental and nutritional needs of species kept in captivity is the key for achieving success in such initiatives. Among the flock health pr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Tropical animal health and production Vol. 50; no. 6; pp. 1349 - 1353 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dordrecht
Springer Netherlands
01-08-2018
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The breeding of wild birds in captivity assumes an increasingly important role in conservation due to the loss of species and their habitats. Providing the environmental and nutritional needs of species kept in captivity is the key for achieving success in such initiatives. Among the flock health practices, we highlight here wild bird vaccination, a scarcely studied subject. This study clinically and serologically evaluates the effect of applying a vaccination protocol against Newcastle disease in three groups of ornamental wild birds. The responses observed in 10 ornamental chickens were compared to those recorded in 12 ring-neck pheasants (
Phasianus colchicus
), 6 psittacines (2 cockatiels
Nymphicus hollandicus
, 2 lorikeets
Trichoglossus haematodus molucanos
, and 2 eastern rosellas
Platycercus eximius
), and 6 touracos (2 guinea
Tauraco persa
, 2 white-cheeked
Tauraco leucotis
, and 2 violet
Musophaga violacea
). One drop of each live Newcastle HB1 and La Sota vaccines were ocularly instilled on the 1st and 21st experimental days, respectively. On the 112th day, one shot of an inactivated oily Newcastle vaccine was intramuscularly injected. Serum samples were submitted to the Newcastle disease virus antibody Test Kit ELISA-BioChek. Except for the psittacines, other bird species showed a considerable increase in the antibody titers. However, their mean antibody titers differed significantly (
P
< 0.05) from that recorded in the chickens. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0049-4747 1573-7438 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11250-018-1567-x |