Method for analysis of environmental lead contamination in soils
A method for lead (Pb) detection in soil is presented. Pb is a dangerous environmental pollutant that is present in soils, posing a health risk to millions of people worldwide, and regular monitoring of Pb contamination in soils is essential to public health. Many sensitive methods for detection of...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Analyst (London) Vol. 146; no. 24; p. 7520 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
England
06-12-2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get more information |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | A method for lead (Pb) detection in soil is presented. Pb is a dangerous environmental pollutant that is present in soils, posing a health risk to millions of people worldwide, and regular monitoring of Pb contamination in soils is essential to public health. Many sensitive methods for detection of heavy metals in solid matrices exist, but they cannot be performed on-site because they are costly (>$30 per sample), require trained personnel, and many classical sample preparation methods are not safe to bring into the field. We describe an alternative process, combining a safer sample preparation method with electrochemical analysis. The process requires minimal training, making it an attractive overall method for regular environmental screening of Pb in soils. Extract obtained from the soil is pH adjusted and analyzed using a stencil-printed carbon electrode and square wave anodic stripping voltammetry. In this work, a study of 15 neighborhood soils examining the concentration of Pb present post-extraction was performed to demonstrate the method. The limit of detection for the electrochemical analysis was calculated to be 16 ppb-well below the United States Environmental Protection Agency's action limit for Pb in soils (400 mg kg
or 4000 ppb)-and third party inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy analysis validated the results obtained in this study to within ±17% on average. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1364-5528 |
| DOI: | 10.1039/d1an01744f |