Conflict and oppositions in the development of peri‐urban agriculture: The case of the Greater São Paulo region

Conflict and oppositions in the development of peri‐urban agriculture: The case of the Greater São Paulo region

One of the main factors preventing food production in urban and peri‐urban areas is territorial opposition between different land uses. The aim of this article is to address the question of conflicts close to large urban centres, taking the example of the São Paulo Metropolitan Region (SPMR), a repr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sociologia ruralis Vol. 63; no. 1; pp. 160 - 177
Main Authors: Torre, André, Fonseca, Brenno
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-01-2023
Wiley
Subjects:
Agricultural development
Agricultural land
Agricultural production
Agriculture
conflict
Food
Food production
Gentrification
Geography
Humanities and Social Sciences
land use
Metropolitan areas
Occupational stress
opposition
Peri-urban areas
peri‐urban agriculture
Regional variations
Regions
Soils
Subsistence agriculture
Supporters
Typology
Urban agriculture
Urban areas
Urban development
Urban farming
urban sprawl
opposition
land use
urban sprawl
peri-urban agriculture
conflict
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:One of the main factors preventing food production in urban and peri‐urban areas is territorial opposition between different land uses. The aim of this article is to address the question of conflicts close to large urban centres, taking the example of the São Paulo Metropolitan Region (SPMR), a representative urban area, which includes both food issues of the cities: the still important presence of subsistence agriculture that serves to feed the local people and the development of much‐gentrified urban agriculture. Our study is based on expert interviews, an analysis of the regional daily press and a study of local information sites and blogs. First, we briefly depict peri‐urban agriculture and its main characteristics, and we stress the importance of land‐use occupation faced with competing uses. Then, we present our method of analysis and the main agricultural characteristics of the SPMR. The third part is devoted to a study of the local conflicts, their location, their link to agriculture and the consumption of agricultural soils and the typology of the opponents and supporters of this activity. Finally, we conclude with some lessons on the place of peri‐urban agriculture drawn from this experiment.
ISSN:0038-0199
1467-9523
DOI:10.1111/soru.12375