Language-Specific Challenges and Solutions for Equitable Telemedicine Implementation in the Primary Care Safety Net During COVID-19

Purpose Telemedicine care dramatically expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic. We characterized facilitators and barriers to telemedicine implementation among safety-net primary care clinics serving patients with limited English proficiency (LEP). Methods We collected data on telemedicine volume and...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM Vol. 38; no. 14; pp. 3123 - 3133
Main Authors:	Sharma, Anjana E., Lisker, Sarah, Fields, Jessica D., Aulakh, Veenu, Figoni, Kathleen, Jones, Maggie E., Arora, Natasha B., Sarkar, Urmimala, Lyles, Courtney R.
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Cham Springer International Publishing 01-11-2023 Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:	Collaboration Communication Barriers COVID-19 COVID-19 - epidemiology Data collection Health care Humans Internal Medicine Interpreters Language Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Research: Qualitative Research Pandemics Patients Platforms Primary care Primary Health Care Safety Telemedicine Uniqueness telemedicine health equity access to care limited English proficiency safety-net clinics
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Purpose Telemedicine care dramatically expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic. We characterized facilitators and barriers to telemedicine implementation among safety-net primary care clinics serving patients with limited English proficiency (LEP). Methods We collected data on telemedicine volume and patient demographics among safety-net clinics participating in a telemedicine learning collaborative. Data on various metrics were reported to the collaborative from February 2019 through August 2021. We conducted semi-structured interviews with clinical and quality leaders, purposively sampling clinics serving high proportions of patients with LEP. We analyzed interviews with a mixed inductive-deductive approach applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Results By September 2020, the 23 sites served 121,589 unique patients with in-person and 120,338 with telephone visits; 47% of these patients had LEP. Of 10,897 unique patients served by video visits, 38% had LEP. As a proportion of total visits, telemedicine (telephone and video) visits increased from 0–17% in October 2019–March 2020 to 10–98% in March–August 2020. We conducted 14 interviews at 11 sites. Themes included (1) existing telemedicine platforms and interpreter services were not optimized to support patients with LEP; (2) clinics invested significant labor iterating workflows; (3) sites with technological infrastructure and language-concordant staff were best suited to serve patients; (4) patients speaking less-represented languages or experiencing intersecting literacy barriers were underserved with telemedicine. Interviewees recommended innovations in telemedicine platforms and community-based access. Conclusions Safety-net sites relied on existing resources to accommodate patients with LEP, but struggled providing access for the most marginalized. Proactive, data-driven strategies to address patient and community barriers as well as optimize clinical workflows with high-quality, certified medical interpreters are needed to ensure equitable access.
Bibliography:	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23
ISSN:	0884-8734 1525-1497 1525-1497
DOI:	10.1007/s11606-023-08304-2