Caudal vena cava point-of-care ultrasound in dogs with degenerative mitral valve disease without clinically important right heart disease

Caudal vena cava (CVC) diameter and collapsibility index (CVCD and CVCCI) have been used to assess intravascular volume status (IVS). Maladaptations with progressive degenerative mitral valve disease (DMVD) lead to hypervolemia. We hypothesised that stages of DMVD will affect ultrasonographic CVC va...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Journal of veterinary cardiology Vol. 41; pp. 18 - 29
Main Authors:	Giraud, L., Fernandes Rodrigues, N., Lekane, M., Farnir, F., Kennedy, C., Gommeren, K., Merveille, A.-C.
Format:	Journal Article Web Resource
Language:	English
Published:	Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01-06-2022
Subjects:	caval size Compensation General Veterinary Life sciences Médecine vétérinaire & santé animale Physiology Sciences du vivant Veterinary (all) Veterinary medicine & animal health volume status Compensation volume status caval size
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Caudal vena cava (CVC) diameter and collapsibility index (CVCD and CVCCI) have been used to assess intravascular volume status (IVS). Maladaptations with progressive degenerative mitral valve disease (DMVD) lead to hypervolemia. We hypothesised that stages of DMVD will affect ultrasonographic CVC variables in dogs without clinically important right heart disease. This retrospective study included 79 dogs with DMVD presented to the cardiology department between January 2017 and 2019. Subxiphoid views were used to obtain CVC cineloops. By visual inspection, CVC was subjectively scored as flat, normal or fat. Maximal and minimal CVCD were measured and indexed to aortic diameter (CVCD-max/Ao and CVCD-min/Ao); CVCCI was calculated as (CVCD-max-CVCD-min)/CVCD-max. Fisher's exact and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to compare CVC variables. Subjective assessment was associated with American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ACVIM) stages (P < 0.001). The proportion of fat CVC was greater in stages C and D. In stage D, CVCD-max/Ao was larger compared with stages B1, B2 and C (P = 0.002, P = 0.002 and P = 0.035, respectively). In stages C and D, CVCD-min/Ao was larger compared with B1 (P = 0.016 and P = 0.001) and B2 (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001. In stages C and D, CVCCI was less than stage B1 (P = 0.016 and P = 0.044) and B2 (P = 0.001 and P = 0.010). In dogs with DMVD without clinically important right heart disease, CVC variables differ across ACVIM stage. Subjective and objective CVC variables may be used to predict hypervolemia.
Bibliography:	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 scopus-id:2-s2.0-85124409475
ISSN:	1760-2734 1875-0834 1875-0834
DOI:	10.1016/j.jvc.2022.01.001