Evaluation of automatic striatal segmentation for the ECAT HRRT images

In quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) brain studies, the temporal dynamics of the radiopharmaceutical are usually analyzed separately for different brain structures. In a clinical environment, the delineation of brain structures is still often performed manually by human experts. In thi...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference pp. 3001 - 3004
Main Authors:	Tuna, U, Tohka, J, Farinha, R J P C, Ruotsalainen, Ulla
Format:	Conference Proceeding
Language:	English
Published:	IEEE 01-10-2010
Subjects:	3D OP-OSEM 3D reprojection Brain clustering Feature extraction gap-filling high resolution research tomograph (ECAT HRRT) Image reconstruction Image resolution Image segmentation Interpolation Positron emission tomography quantitative evaluation reconstruction
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	In quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) brain studies, the temporal dynamics of the radiopharmaceutical are usually analyzed separately for different brain structures. In a clinical environment, the delineation of brain structures is still often performed manually by human experts. In this study, we concentrate on automatic segmentation of the striatal brain structures (caudate, posterior and anterior putamen and ventral striatum) from the binding potential (BP ND ) images derived based on [ 11 C]-raclopride studies. Previously, a method for the automatic segmentation of the striatal structures was proposed for the ECAT high resolution research tomograph (HRRT, CTI PET Systems, Knoxville, TN, USA) BP ND images. The method is based on clustering the affinity matrix (containing the features as intensity values, spatial connectivity and distance) of the striatum which is extracted by using a deformable surface model. In clustering, the method uses weighted kernel k-means algorithm. In this study, we evaluate the segmentation method with a test-retest dataset. We studied the segmentation differences between the analytical (3D-RP) and iterative (3D-OPOSEM) reconstructions of the ECAT HRRT data. In addition to visual comparisons, for different reconstruction methods, normalized absolute differences (NAD) between the segmented regions of test-retest BP ND images were calculated. We observed that NAD values were within acceptable limits in most cases. However, the ventral striatum segmentation failed to some extent. Furthermore, it is obvious that robustness of this kind of brain structure extraction methods should be tested with various reconstruction methods.
ISBN:	9781424491063 1424491061
ISSN:	1082-3654 2577-0829
DOI:	10.1109/NSSMIC.2010.5874348