Group Know-How A Reply to Palermos and Tollefsen
In recent work, Palermos and Tollefsen develop a novel account of group know-how (GKH)—know-how applicable to a group as a whole—and which they take to be superior to envisioned accounts of group know-how that reduce the group know-how to that of individuals. While their argument has promise, I aim...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Logos & episteme Vol. 15; no. 2; pp. 229 - 242 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | In recent work, Palermos and Tollefsen develop a novel account of group know-how (GKH)—know-how applicable to a group as a whole—and which they take to be superior to envisioned accounts of group know-how that reduce the group know-how to that of individuals. While their argument has promise, I aim to show that it succumbs to several objections, an appreciation of which gives us a better sense of what desiderata a satisfactory account of group-level know-how will need to meet. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2069-0533 |
| DOI: | 10.5840/logos-episteme202415218 |