Search Results - "Fábio Perin Shecaira"

The Value of Methodological Deductivism in Argument Construction by Shecaira, Fábio Perin

“…“Deductivism” is a broad label for various theories that emphasize the importance of deductive argument in contexts of rational discussion. This paper makes a…”
Get full text

Legal Audiences by Shecaira, Fábio Perin, Struchiner, Noel

“…This paper approaches legal argumentation from a rhetorical perspective. It discusses the nature of the audiences that are (and should be) targeted by judges…”
Get full text

How to Disagree About Argument Schemes by Shecaira, Fábio Perin

“…Argumentation theorists often disagree about which scheme best represents a given type of argument (e.g. argument by analogy, argument from authority,…”
Get full text

Werther and the (putative) power of literature by Shecaira, Fábio Perin

“…Friends of literature often claim that it is capable of making readers more tolerant and benevolent. Enemies of literature, on the other hand, claim that it is…”
Get full text

Analogical Arguments in Ethics and Law: A Defence of Deductivism by Shecaira, Fábio Perin

“…The paper provides a qualified defence of Bruce Waller’s deductivist schema for a priori analogical arguments in ethics and law. One crucial qualification is…”
Get full text

A importância da literatura para juristas (sem exageros) by Shecaira, Fábio Perin

“…O principal objetivo deste artigo é discutir o valor moral da literatura para o jurista. A ideia comum (defendida por autoras como Robin West, Martha Nussbaum…”
Get full text

Legal Scholarship and the Subject Matter of Jurisprudence by Perin Shecaira, Fábio

“…There is a remarkable difference between that which Anglo-American legal philosophers more or less unanimously regard as their subject matter (namely, law and…”
Get full text

Justice and Law According to Hart by Shecaira, Fábio Perin

Get full text

Legal Arguments from Scholarly Authority by Shecaira, Fábio Perin

“…Ordinary arguments from authority have the following structure: A says p; A is authoritative on such things; so p. Legal actors use such arguments whenever…”
Get full text

Sources of Law Are not Legal Norms by Shecaira, Fábio Perin

“…Anglo‐American authors have paid little attention to a subtle distinction that has important jurisprudential implications. It is the distinction between…”
Get full text

Justice and Law According to Hart by Shecaira, Fábio Perin

“…Consider three different theses regarding the relation between law and justice: (a) Justice has priority (relative to other moral values) in the evaluation of…”
Get full text

Audience Diversity and the Rhetorical Value of Public Reason by Shecaira, Fábio Perin, Struchiner, Noel

Get full text

How to Disagree About Argument Schemes by Fábio Perin Shecaira

“…Argumentation theorists often disagree about which scheme best represents a given type of argument (e.g. argument by analogy, argument from authority,…”
Get full text

Reports and criticism : audience diversity and the rhetorical value of public reason by Perin Shecaira, Fábio, Struchiner, Noel

“…Here is a brief summary of the main points of the paper: 1) The supposed tension between public reason and rhetorical persuasion. Rhetorical theorists often…”
Get full text

Analogical Arguments in Ethics and Law: A Defence of Deductivism by Fábio Perin Shecaira

“…The paper provides a qualified defence of Bruce Waller’s deductivist schema for a priori analogical arguments in ethics and law. One crucial qualification is…”
Get full text

Legal Scholarship and the Subject Matter of Jurisprudence by Perin Shecaira, Fábio

Get full text

Hartian Positivism as a (Plausible) Error Theory by Shecaira, Fábio Perin

Get full text

Trying to Fix Roots in Quicksand: Some Difficulties with Waluchow´s Conception of the True Community Morality by Struchiner, Noel, Shecaira, Fábio Perin

Get full text

Dealing with judicial rhetoric : a defence of Hartian positivism by Fabio Perin SHECAIRA

“…Ronald Dworkin's objection to Hartian positivism - judges disagreements about content of the law - 'theoretical disagreement' in law - interpretive methodology…”
Get full text