A systematic critical appraisal of non-pharmacological management of rheumatoid arthritis with Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been developed to summarize evidence about the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and facilitate the uptake of evidence-based knowledge by consumers, health professionals, health administrators and policy makers. The objectives of this review was to asse...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one Vol. 9; no. 5; p. e95369
Main Authors: Brosseau, Lucie, Rahman, Prinon, Poitras, Stéphane, Toupin-April, Karine, Paterson, Gail, Smith, Christine, King, Judy, Casimiro, Lynn, De Angelis, Gino, Loew, Laurianne, Cavallo, Sabrina, Ewan, Jessica Mc
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Public Library of Science 19-05-2014
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been developed to summarize evidence about the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and facilitate the uptake of evidence-based knowledge by consumers, health professionals, health administrators and policy makers. The objectives of this review was to assess the quality of CPGS on non-pharmacological management of RA with a standardized and validated instrument--the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool and summarize the key recommendations from these CPGs. Scientific literature databases from 2001 to 2013 were systematically searched and a total of 13 CPGs for RA was identified. Only a minority of AGREE II domains were effectively addressed by the CPGS. Scope and purpose was effectively addressed in 10 out of 13 CPGs, stakeholder involvement in 11 CPGs, rigor of development in 6 CPGs, clarity/presentation in 9 CPGs, editorial independence in 1 CPGs, and applicability in none of the CPGs. The overall quality of the included CPGs according to the 7-point AGREE II scoring system was 4.8 ± 1.04. Patient education/self-management, aerobic, dynamic and stretching exercises were the commonly recommended for the non-pharmacological management of RA by the high-quality CPGs. The general clinical management recommendations tended to be similar among high-quality CPGs. Non-pharmacological management interventions were superficially addressed in more than half of the selected CPGs. CPGs creators should use the AGREE II criteria when developing guidelines. Innovative and effective methods of CPGs implementation to users are needed to ultimately enhance the quality of life of arthritic individuals. In addition, it was difficult to establish between strongly recommended, recommended and weakly recommended, as there is no consensus between the strength of the recommendations between the appraised CPGs.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
Competing Interests: LB was involved in the development of the series of Ottawa Panel CPGs, but did not review the quality of her own CPGs to avoid possible competing interests. Also, other authors (LC, GD, LL, SP, JK, JM) were involved in the Ottawa panel CPGs, but not in the evaluation of the quality of CPGs in the actual review. To ensure objectivity of the discussion, the remaining authors were not involved in any of the CPGs and were involved in the discussion of results and the review of the manuscript prior to submission (PR, GP, CS & SC). There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Conceived and designed the experiments: LB PR KTA JK LC GDA LL SC JM. Analyzed the data: PR KTA GP CS SP SC. Wrote the paper: LB PR KTA GP CS JK LC GDA LL SP SC.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0095369