Safety and efficacy of percutaneous catheter-directed treatment for intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism

Abstract Background Pulmonary embolism (PE) is globally the third most frequent acute cardiovascular syndrome, ranking high among the causes of cardiovascular mortality. Systemic thrombolytic therapy (STT) permits prompt reperfusion after pulmonary obstruction, nevertheless this treatment carries by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European heart journal Vol. 42; no. Supplement_1
Main Authors: Rumiz Gonzalez, E, Vilar Herrero, J V, Escriva, G M, Vidal Urrutia, V, Fernandez Cisnal, A, Cubillos Arango, A, Nunez Villota, J, Berenguer Jofresa, A, Sanchis Fores, J, Valero Picher, E
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 12-10-2021
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Pulmonary embolism (PE) is globally the third most frequent acute cardiovascular syndrome, ranking high among the causes of cardiovascular mortality. Systemic thrombolytic therapy (STT) permits prompt reperfusion after pulmonary obstruction, nevertheless this treatment carries by itself an inherent risk of major bleeding events. Development of new therapies and interventions that allow us to achieve early lung reperfusion along with a reduced risk of bleeding are necessary. Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous catheter-directed treatment (PCDT) on intermediate-high risk PE patients with high bleeding risk or contraindication for STT. Methods We consecutively included all patients with intermediate-high risk PE undergoing PCDT in two university hospitals. Clinical, echocardiographic and hemodynamic variables (pre and post PCDT) were collected, as well as major adverse cardiac and bleeding events during follow-up. Results Between February 2018 and January 2021, we included 30 consecutive patients admitted with intermediate-high risk PE who underwent PCDT. Median age was 60 years, interquartile range (IQR) 51–72, and 41% were women. 14 patients (46.6%) presented an absolute contraindication for STT, which was the main reason for performing PCDT. Catheter-directed local thrombolysis (CDLT) was performed in 27 (90%) patients and mechanical fragmentation-aspiration was performed in 12 (40%) of them. We observed a significant reduction in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP, mmHg) after PCDT: 40±13 vs. 25±12, p<0.001; as well as in NT-proBNP concentrations (pg/ml) 48 hours post-PCDT: 4791±1077 vs. 2311±680, p=0.002, (Figure 1). Echocardiographic parameters of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction also experienced a significant improvement 72 hours post-PCDT: TAPSE (mm) 15±2 vs. 22±3, p=0.001, (Figure 2); basal RV diameter (mm) 51±4 vs. 41±2, p=0.001. During a median follow-up of 13 months, IQR (8–22), 1 patient died from non-cardiac cause and no patient presented a bleeding event. Conclusions PCDT for intermediate-high risk PE is safe and effective, producing an early reduction in mPAP, in prognostic biomarkers such as NT-proBNP, as well as an early improvement of classic echocardiographic parameters of RV dysfunction. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1Figure 2
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.1936