Women's experiences following failed vaginal birth after cesarean delivery

Abstract Objective: To assess the experience of women in whom a trial of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) has failed. Methods: Pretested self-administered questionnaires containing both open- and closed-ended questions were given to the participants while they were waiting for an antenatal check-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of gynecology and obstetrics Vol. 99; no. 2; pp. 113 - 116
Main Authors: Chigbu, C.O., Enwereji, J.O., Ikeme, A.C.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Shannon Elsevier Ireland Ltd 01-11-2007
Elsevier Science
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective: To assess the experience of women in whom a trial of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) has failed. Methods: Pretested self-administered questionnaires containing both open- and closed-ended questions were given to the participants while they were waiting for an antenatal check-up. The responses to the closed-ended questions were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Content analysis was used for the responses to the open-ended questions. Results: The women with a history of a successful vaginal delivery reported a positive experience whereas those with no history of vaginal delivery reported a negative experience. The women found the limited options available to them the most dissatisfying aspect of attempting a VBAC. Conclusion: An unsuccessful trial of VBAC could have significant adverse effects on women, especially on those who have never given birth vaginally. Adequate antenatal education for women planning a trial of VBAC, postdelivery support following an unsuccessful trial of VBAC, and research aimed at expanding the options available to women as they are attempting VBAC are recommended.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0020-7292
1879-3479
DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.04.043