Women's experiences following failed vaginal birth after cesarean delivery
Abstract Objective: To assess the experience of women in whom a trial of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) has failed. Methods: Pretested self-administered questionnaires containing both open- and closed-ended questions were given to the participants while they were waiting for an antenatal check-...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics Vol. 99; no. 2; pp. 113 - 116 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Shannon
Elsevier Ireland Ltd
01-11-2007
Elsevier Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract Objective: To assess the experience of women in whom a trial of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) has failed. Methods: Pretested self-administered questionnaires containing both open- and closed-ended questions were given to the participants while they were waiting for an antenatal check-up. The responses to the closed-ended questions were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Content analysis was used for the responses to the open-ended questions. Results: The women with a history of a successful vaginal delivery reported a positive experience whereas those with no history of vaginal delivery reported a negative experience. The women found the limited options available to them the most dissatisfying aspect of attempting a VBAC. Conclusion: An unsuccessful trial of VBAC could have significant adverse effects on women, especially on those who have never given birth vaginally. Adequate antenatal education for women planning a trial of VBAC, postdelivery support following an unsuccessful trial of VBAC, and research aimed at expanding the options available to women as they are attempting VBAC are recommended. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0020-7292 1879-3479 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.04.043 |