Encoding type, medication, and deep brain stimulation differentially affect memory-guided sequential reaching movements in Parkinson's disease

Memory-guided movements, vital to daily activities, are especially impaired in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, studies examining the effects of how information is encoded in memory and the effects of common treatments of PD, such as medication and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in neurology Vol. 13; p. 980935
Main Authors: David, Fabian J, Rivera, Yessenia M, Entezar, Tara K, Arora, Rishabh, Drane, Quentin H, Munoz, Miranda J, Rosenow, Joshua M, Sani, Sepehr B, Pal, Gian D, Verhagen-Metman, Leonard, Corcos, Daniel M
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 17-10-2022
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Memory-guided movements, vital to daily activities, are especially impaired in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, studies examining the effects of how information is encoded in memory and the effects of common treatments of PD, such as medication and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS), on memory-guided movements are uncommon and their findings are equivocal. We designed two memory-guided sequential reaching tasks, peripheral-vision or proprioception encoded, to investigate the effects of encoding type (peripheral-vision vs. proprioception), medication (on- vs. off-), STN-DBS (on- vs. off-, while off-medication), and compared STN-DBS vs. medication on reaching amplitude, error, and velocity. We collected data from 16 (analyzed = 7) participants with PD, pre- and post-STN-DBS surgery, and 17 (analyzed = 14) healthy controls. We had four important findings. First, encoding type differentially affected reaching performance: peripheral-vision reaches were faster and more accurate. Also, encoding type differentially affected reaching deficits in PD compared to healthy controls: peripheral-vision reaches manifested larger deficits in amplitude. Second, the effect of medication depended on encoding type: medication had no effect on amplitude, but reduced error for both encoding types, and increased velocity only during peripheral-vision encoding. Third, the effect of STN-DBS depended on encoding type: STN-DBS increased amplitude for both encoding types, increased error during proprioception encoding, and increased velocity for both encoding types. Fourth, STN-DBS was superior to medication with respect to increasing amplitude and velocity, whereas medication was superior to STN-DBS with respect to reducing error. We discuss our findings in the context of the previous literature and consider mechanisms for the differential effects of medication and STN-DBS.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Movement Disorders, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology
Edited by: Genko Oyama, Juntendo University, Japan
Reviewed by: Katsuo Kimura, Yokohama City University, Japan; Sungyang Jo, University of Ulsan, South Korea; Stephanie Cernera, University of California, San Francisco, United States
ISSN:1664-2295
1664-2295
DOI:10.3389/fneur.2022.980935