Microwave ablation of cT1a renal cell carcinoma: oncologic and functional outcomes at a single center
Percutaneous ablation is an established alternative to surgical intervention for small renal masses. Radiofrequency and cryoablation have been studied extensively in the literature. To date, series assessing the efficacy and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) are limited. We present a cohort of 110...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Clinical imaging Vol. 76; pp. 199 - 204 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01-08-2021
Elsevier Limited |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Percutaneous ablation is an established alternative to surgical intervention for small renal masses. Radiofrequency and cryoablation have been studied extensively in the literature. To date, series assessing the efficacy and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) are limited. We present a cohort of 110 renal tumors treated with MWA.
A review of the medical record between January 2015 and July 2019 was performed, retrospectively identifying 101 patients (110 tumors). All ablations were performed by a single board-certified urologist/interventional radiologist. Demographic information, intraoperative, postoperative, and follow-up surveillance data were recorded.
Median (IQR) age was 69.7 years (60.8–77.0); 27 (24%) were female. Median (IQR) BMI was 27.0 (25.1–30.2) and Charleston Comorbidity Index was 5.0 (4.0–6.0). 82 tumors were biopsy-confirmed renal cell carcinoma/oncocytic neoplasms. Median (IQR) tumor size was 2.0 cm (1.5–2.6). Median (IQR) RENAL nephrometry score was 6.0 (5.0–8.0). Technical success was achieved in all patients and all but one patient were discharged on the same day. Median (IQR) eGFR at baseline and 1 year were 71.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 (56.5–82) and 63.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 (54.0–78.2); the difference was −5.3 (p = 0.12). Two Clavien-Dindo type-I complications, one type-II complication, and one type-III complication were experienced in this cohort. Median radiographic follow-up was 376.5 days with 2 tumors (2.4% of RCC/oncocytic neoplasms) having recurred to date.
MWA is a safe and efficacious treatment option for small renal masses with minimal adverse events and low rates of recurrence in this cohort of 101 patients. Continued follow-up is needed to assess long-term outcomes.
•Microwave ablation is comparably as safe with similar complication rates as other thermal ablation techniques.•Microwave ablation of small renal masses has local recurrence rates similar to other thermal ablation techniques. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 |
| ISSN: | 0899-7071 1873-4499 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.04.016 |