Association of Use of the NEJM Knowledge+ Product and Performance on the ABIM IM-MOC Exam
Phenomenon: Internal medicine physicians in the United States must pass the American Board of Internal Medicine Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification (ABIM IM-MOC) examination as part of their ABIM IM-MOC requirements. Many of these physicians use an examination product to help them prepare...
Saved in:
Published in: | Teaching and learning in medicine Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 21 - 27 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Routledge
01-01-2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Phenomenon: Internal medicine physicians in the United States must pass the American Board of Internal Medicine Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification (ABIM IM-MOC) examination as part of their ABIM IM-MOC requirements. Many of these physicians use an examination product to help them prepare, such as e-Learning products, including the ACP's MKSAP, UpToDate, and NEJM Knowledge+, yet their effectiveness remains largely unstudied. Approach: We compared ABIM IM-MOC examination performance among 177 physicians who attempted an ABIM IM-MOC examination between 2014-2017 and completed at least 75% of the NEJM Knowledge+ product prior to the ABIM IM-MOC examination and 177 very similar matched control physicians who did not use NEJM Knowledge+. Our measures of ABIM IM-MOC exam performance for NEJM Knowledge+ users were based on the results of the first attempt immediately following the NEJM Knowledge+ use and for non-users were based on the applicable matched examination performance. The three dichotomous examination performance outcomes measured on the first attempt at the ABIM IM-MOC examination included pass rate, scoring in the upper quartile, and scoring in the lower quartile. Findings: Use of NEJM Knowledge+ was associated with a regression adjusted 10.6% (5.37% to 15.8%) greater likelihood of passing the MOC examination (p < .001), 10.7% (2.61% to 18.7%) greater likelihood of having an examination score in the top quartile (p = .009), and −10.8% (-16.8% to −4.86%) lower likelihood of being in the bottom quartile of the MOC examination (p < .001) as compared to similar physicians who did not use NEJM Knowledge+. Insight: Physicians who used NEJM Knowledge+ had better ABIM IM-MOC exam performance. Further research is needed to determine what aspects of e-Learning products best prepare physicians for MOC examinations. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1040-1334 1532-8015 |
DOI: | 10.1080/10401334.2020.1811095 |