A Predictive Approach to Nutrient Criteria

Violation of a water quality standard triggers the need for a total maximum daily load (TMDL); this should result in actions that improve water quality, but sometimes at significant cost. If the standard is well-conceived, a designated-use statement characterizes societal values, and a criterion pro...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Environmental science & technology Vol. 39; no. 9; pp. 2913 - 2919
Main Authors:	Reckhow, K. H, Arhonditsis, G. B, Kenney, M. A, Hauser, L, Tribo, J, Wu, C, Elcock, K. J, Steinberg, L. J, Stow, C. A, McBride, S. J
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Washington, DC American Chemical Society 01-05-2005
Subjects:	Applied sciences Case studies Criteria Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics Environmental policy Environmental science Exact sciences and technology Forecasting Models, Theoretical Nitrogen Phosphorus Pollution Pollution, environment geology Quality Control Rivers United States United States Environmental Protection Agency Water Pollution - prevention & control Water Pollution - statistics & numerical data Water quality Water treatment and pollution San Francisco Bay United States North America Washington America Lake Washington Lake Mendota Neuse River Water quality index Environmental policy Water resource management Estuaries Eutrophication Risk assessment Surface water Lakes Selection criterion Nutrient Stream Water pollution Environmental protection
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Violation of a water quality standard triggers the need for a total maximum daily load (TMDL); this should result in actions that improve water quality, but sometimes at significant cost. If the standard is well-conceived, a designated-use statement characterizes societal values, and a criterion provides a measurable surrogate for designated use. This latter provision means that scientists measure the criterion and view violations of the criterion as equivalent to noncompliance with the designated use. However, if a criterion is not a good indicator of designated use, it is apt to result in misallocation of the limited resources for water quality improvement through the TMDL process. This concern provides the basis for our assessment of the national nutrient criteria strategy recently proposed by the U.S. EPA. We acquired data sets for four case studies (Lake Washington, Neuse River Estuary, San Francisco Bay, and Lake Mendota) and then used expert elicitation to quantify designated-use attainment for each case. Applying structural equation modeling, we identified good water quality criteria as the best predictors of the designated use elicited response variable. Further, we used the model to relate the level (concentration) of each criterion to the probability of compliance with the designated use; this provides decision-makers with an estimate of risk associated with the criterion level, facilitating the selection of appropriate water quality criteria.
Bibliography:	ark:/67375/TPS-XV53RMLW-C istex:8D79F9FB636FC1E79E010F784D5FC404C2FCA3D5
ISSN:	0013-936X 1520-5851
DOI:	10.1021/es048584i