Application of cellulose, lignin and camphor stem as new biosorbents for removal of brilliant green and crystal violet dyes from wastewater

The aim of the present work was to prepare low cost and environmental friendliness biosorbents and use them for the removal of hazardous compounds from wastewater. Cellulose and lignin biosorbents were prepared from camphor stem using H 2 SO 4 (1:1) and 3 M NaOH solutions. Also, many biosorbents wer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arab journal of basic and applied sciences Vol. 26; no. 1; pp. 414 - 423
Main Authors: Moawed, Elhossein A., Kiwaan, Hala A., Elbaraay, Amira A. A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis 02-01-2019
Taylor & Francis Group
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of the present work was to prepare low cost and environmental friendliness biosorbents and use them for the removal of hazardous compounds from wastewater. Cellulose and lignin biosorbents were prepared from camphor stem using H 2 SO 4 (1:1) and 3 M NaOH solutions. Also, many biosorbents were prepared by heating the camphor sticks at 105, 150, 200 and 250 °C which were characterized by the SEM, XDR, FTIR, UV/Vis, pH ZPC and surface site analysis techniques. The camphor biosorbents were applied for removal of brilliant green (Br.G) and crystal violet (Cr.V) dyes from wastewater. The camphor biosorbents were found highly efficient for removal of Br.G and Cr.V dyes (95-100%) at pH 5-7 within a period of 2-5 min. The process was described by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model with the corresponding R 2 value (0.999). The negative values ΔG (-8.1 and -2.4 kJ/mol) found for the removal of Br.G and Cr.V using camphor biosorbents shows the feasibility and the spontaneity of the removal process. The detection limit (LOD) and removal percentage (E%) of the tested dyes from different wastewater locations of were found in the ranges 0.1-2.9 μg/L and 92-100% respectively with the relative standard deviation (RSD% 0.05-1.16%) for five replicating procedures (n = 5).
ISSN:2576-5299
2576-5299
DOI:10.1080/25765299.2019.1655190