Combining different design strategies for rational affinity maturation of the MICA‐NKG2D interface

We redesigned residues on the surface of MICA, a protein that binds the homodimeric immunoreceptor NKG2D, to increase binding affinity with a series of rational, incremental changes. A fixed‐backbone RosettaDesign protocol scored a set of initial mutations, which we tested by surface plasmon resonan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Protein science Vol. 21; no. 9; pp. 1396 - 1402
Main Authors: Henager, Samuel H., Hale, Melissa A., Maurice, Nicholas J., Dunnington, Erin C., Swanson, Carter J., Peterson, Megan J., Ban, Joseph J., Culpepper, David J., Davies, Luke D., Sanders, Lisa K., McFarland, Benjamin J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01-09-2012
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We redesigned residues on the surface of MICA, a protein that binds the homodimeric immunoreceptor NKG2D, to increase binding affinity with a series of rational, incremental changes. A fixed‐backbone RosettaDesign protocol scored a set of initial mutations, which we tested by surface plasmon resonance for thermodynamics and kinetics of NKG2D binding, both singly and in combination. We combined the best four mutations at the surface with three affinity‐enhancing mutations below the binding interface found with a previous design strategy. After curating design scores with three cross‐validated tests, we found a linear relationship between free energy of binding and design score, and to a lesser extent, enthalpy and design score. Multiple mutants bound with substantial subadditivity, but in at least one case full additivity was observed when combining distant mutations. Altogether, combining the best mutations from the two strategies into a septuple mutant enhanced affinity by 50‐fold, to 50 nM, demonstrating a simple, effective protocol for affinity enhancement.
Bibliography:S.H.H. designed and completed protein biochemistry and computational experiments and edited the manuscript; M.A.H., N.J.M., E.C.D., C.J.S., M.J.P., J.J.B., L.D.D., and L.K.S. designed and completed DNA mutagenesis, protein expression, purification, assessment, and data analysis and edited the manuscript; D.J.C. designed and completed computational experiments and edited the manuscript; and B.J.M.: conceived and designed the experiments, completed computational experiments, and wrote the manuscript.
Author contributions
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Grant sponsor: NIH; Grant number: 2 R15 AI058972-02 (to B.J.M.); Grant sponsor: Seattle Pacific University Montana Endowment Grant (to B.J.M.).
Megan J. Peterson's current address is the Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.
Carter J. Swanson's current address is the Department of Biophysics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Lisa K. Sanders's current address is the School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Author contributions: S.H.H. designed and completed protein biochemistry and computational experiments and edited the manuscript; M.A.H., N.J.M., E.C.D., C.J.S., M.J.P., J.J.B., L.D.D., and L.K.S. designed and completed DNA mutagenesis, protein expression, purification, assessment, and data analysis and edited the manuscript; D.J.C. designed and completed computational experiments and edited the manuscript; and B.J.M.: conceived and designed the experiments, completed computational experiments, and wrote the manuscript.
ISSN:0961-8368
1469-896X
DOI:10.1002/pro.2115