Conventional Versus Traction-Assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Esophageal, Gastric, and Colorectal Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Conventional Versus Traction-Assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Esophageal, Gastric, and Colorectal Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly being utilized for the resection of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. However, the long procedure time poses a technical challenge for conventional ESD (C-ESD). Traction-assisted ESD (T-ESD) was developed to facilitate the procedure by red...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) Vol. 16; no. 3; p. e55645
Main Authors: Giacobo Nunes, Felipe, Gomes, Igor Logetto Caetité, De Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux, Dominguez, Juan Eduardo G, Fornari, Fernando, Ribeiro, Igor Braga, Peixoto de Oliveira, Guilherme Henrique, de Figueiredo, Sérgio Mazzola P, Bernardo, Wanderley Marques, Hourneaux de Moura, Eduardo G
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Cureus Inc 06-03-2024
Subjects:
Clinical trials
Colorectal cancer
Data collection
Dental floss
Dissection
Endoscopy
Esophagus
Meta-analysis
Stomach
Systematic review
Tumors
Japan
endoscopic submucosal dissection
endoscopy
traction
endoscopic advanced treatment
gastrointestinal endoscopy
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly being utilized for the resection of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. However, the long procedure time poses a technical challenge for conventional ESD (C-ESD). Traction-assisted ESD (T-ESD) was developed to facilitate the procedure by reducing its duration. This study compares the efficacy and safety of C-ESD versus T-ESD in the treatment of esophageal, gastric, and colorectal neoplasms. Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were analyzed. Traction-assisted ESD exhibited shorter mean dissection times for the esophagus and colorectal regions and lower perforation rates in colorectal cases. No significant differences were observed in en bloc resection or bleeding rates. Traction-assisted ESD proves to be more efficient in mean procedure time for esophageal and colorectal cases and safer in perforation rates for colorectal cases, but similar rates are noted for en bloc resection or bleeding.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:2168-8184
2168-8184
DOI:10.7759/cureus.55645