From Cassyrane to Cashmeran - The Molecular Parameters of Odorants

This review, including some new experimental results, is the summary of a talk at the ‘flavors & fragrances 2013’ conference in Leipzig, organized jointly by the GDCh, the Liebig‐Vereinigung, and the EuCheMS. After times of searching for natural odor principles and serendipitous discoveries by c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Chemistry & biodiversity Vol. 11; no. 10; pp. 1567 - 1596
Main Authors: Kraft, Philip, Di Cristofaro, Valeria, Jordi, Samuel
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Zürich WILEY-VCH Verlag 01-10-2014
WILEY‐VCH Verlag
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This review, including some new experimental results, is the summary of a talk at the ‘flavors & fragrances 2013’ conference in Leipzig, organized jointly by the GDCh, the Liebig‐Vereinigung, and the EuCheMS. After times of searching for natural odor principles and serendipitous discoveries by chemical inspiration, directed odorant design today offers the highest hit rates for the discovery of new odorants, although serendipity still plays a role. Keeping intact the electronic shape required for a certain olfactophore‐binding geometry, one can add or subtract structural elements, rigidify molecular structures, or introduce more structural flexibility. To find out which structural features are critical, the ‘seco‐approach’, in which different fragments are removed by cutting strategic bonds, is the most analytical. Following this approach, such ingredients as Serenolide, Sylkolide, and Pomarose were designed. Transferring this design principle from the family of damascones to that of the theaspiranes led to the discovery of Cassyrane, though completely different structural features turned out to be relevant. Application of the seco‐concept to a 3,7a‐substituted 2,6,7,7a‐tetrahydro‐1H‐inden‐5‐yl musk lead structure derived from carotol resulted in the discovery of a new family of dienone musks with novel structureodor correlations. However, cutting the C(2)O bond of Cassyrane and oxidizing the resulting seco‐structure to the 1,2,5,1″‐tetradehydro derivative links the family of dienone musks with that of blackcurrant odorants, but the resulting target structures turned out to be potent orris odorants. (3E,5E)‐5‐(tert‐Butyl)octadeca‐3,5‐dien‐2‐one even possesses the lowest odor threshold in the whole ionone family (0.036 ng/l air), which could be rationalized by a superposition analysis on (−)‐cis‐γ‐irone. In the course of the synthesis of these high‐impact orris odorants, we discovered that, depending on the reaction conditions, the dehydration step of the intermediate 5‐hydroxyalk‐3‐yn‐2‐ones was accompanied by a carbenium‐ion rearrangement. Depending on the substitution pattern, these rearrangement products and their derivatives possessed interesting musky‐woody olfactory properties reminiscent of Cashmeran, demonstrating that the same structural elements can code for completely different odors, i.e., cassis, musk, orris, violet, and Cashmeran‐type, depending only on their spatial arrangement.
Bibliography:istex:0D1CAB307E6297698A0BF55FA2125E6907E486E2
ArticleID:CBDV201400071
ark:/67375/WNG-W54WL2GF-7
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1612-1872
1612-1880
DOI:10.1002/cbdv.201400071