"I Went Into This Field to Empower Other People, and I Feel Like I Failed": Residents Experience Moral Distress Post- Dobbs
The 2022 Supreme Court ruling in nullified the constitutional right to abortion, which led to effective bans in at least 14 US states and placed obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residents in dilemmas where they may have to withhold care, potentially causing moral distress-a health care workforce p...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of graduate medical education Vol. 16; no. 3; pp. 271 - 279 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education
01-06-2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The 2022 Supreme Court ruling in
nullified the constitutional right to abortion, which led to effective bans in at least 14 US states and placed obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residents in dilemmas where they may have to withhold care, potentially causing moral distress-a health care workforce phenomenon less understood among resident physicians.
To identify and explore moral distress experienced by OB/GYN residents due to care restrictions post-
.
In 2023, we invited OB/GYN residents, identified by their program directors, training in states with restricted abortion access, to participate in one-on-one, semi-structured interviews via Zoom about their experiences caring for patients post-
. We used thematic analysis to analyze interview data.
Twenty-one residents described their experiences of moral distress due to restrictions. We report on 3 themes in their accounts related to moral distress (and 4 subthemes): (1) challenges to their physician identity (inability to do the job, internalized distress, and reconsidering career choices); (2) participating in care that exacerbates inequities (and erodes patient trust); and (3) determination to advocate for and provide abortion care in the future.
OB/GYN residents grappled with moral distress and identified challenges from abortion restrictions. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1949-8349 1949-8357 |
DOI: | 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00582.1 |