Search Results - "DE ROUILHAN, Philippe"

  • Showing 1 - 20 results of 20
Refine Results
  1. 1

    Un dilemme pour la philosophie scientifique en général et pour celle de Carnap en particulier by Philippe de Rouilhan

    Published in Philosophia scientiae (25-10-2018)
    “…There is a fairly evident dilemma for scientific philosophy—limited here for the sake of simplicity to scientific philosophy of science—in which Carnap found…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  2. 2

    Note sur Popper lecteur de Tarski by Philippe de Rouilhan

    Published in Philosophia scientiae (01-06-2007)
    “…1. Introduction. 2. Is Tarski’s theory of truth, as Popper claims after Tarski himself, a rehabilitation of the traditional view of truth as correspondence to…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  3. 3

    Un dilemme pour la philosophie scientifique en général et pour celle de Carnap en particulier by Philippe de Rouilhan

    Published in Philosophia scientiae (01-10-2018)
    “…There is a fairly evident dilemma for scientific philosophy—limited here for the sake of simplicity to scientific philosophy of science—in which Carnap found…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

    In Defense of Logical Universalism: Taking Issue with Jean van Heijenoort by de Rouilhan, Philippe

    Published in Logica universalis (01-12-2012)
    “…Van Heijenoort’s main contribution to history and philosophy of modern logic was his distinction between two basic views of logic, first, the absolutist, or…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  7. 7

    Note sur Popper lecteur de Tarski by Philippe de Rouilhan

    Published in Philosophia scientiae (01-06-2007)
    “…1. Introduction. 2. Is Tarski’s theory of truth, as Popper claims after Tarski himself, a rehabilitation of the traditional view of truth as correspondence to…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  8. 8

    On What There Are by de Rouilhan, Philippe

    Published in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (01-01-2002)
    “…Is second-order quantification legitimate? For Quine, it was pure non-sense, unless construed as first-order quantification in disguise, ranging over sets…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  9. 9

    Note sur l’ordre de IF : Hintikka a-t-il véritablement découvert la véritable logique élémentaire ? by Philippe de Rouilhan

    Published in Philosophia scientiae (01-05-2005)
    “…Is IF logic the true elementary logic, as Hintikka claims? Moreover is it truly elementary, viz. first-order, in the first place? One is tempted to answer no,…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  10. 10

    Note sur l’ordre de IF : Hintikka a-t-il véritablement découvert la véritable logique élémentaire ? by Philippe de Rouilhan

    Published in Philosophia scientiae (01-05-2005)
    “…Is IF logic the true elementary logic, as Hintikka claims? Moreover is it truly elementary, viz. first-order, in the first place? One is tempted to answer no,…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  11. 11
  12. 12

    X-On What there Are by De Rouilhan, Philippe

    Published in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (01-06-2002)
    “…Is second‐order quantification legitimate? For Quine, it was pure non‐sense, unless construed as first‐order quantification in disguise, ranging over sets…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  13. 13

    X-On What There Are by de Rouilhan, Philippe

    Published in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (01-01-2002)
    “…Abstract only…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16

    The Basic Problem of the Logic of Meaning (I) by de Rouilhan, Philippe

    Published in Revue internationale de philosophie (01-09-2004)
    “…Le « probleme fondamental de la theorie des ensembles » (comme disait Mirimanoff) est pose par le paradoxe de Russell relatif aux ensembles. Ce paradoxe montre…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  17. 17
  18. 18

    The Basic Problem of the Logic of Meaning (I) by de Rouilhan, Philippe

    Published in Revue internationale de philosophie (01-07-2004)
    “…Le « problème fondamental de la théorie des ensembles » (comme disait Mirimanoff) est posé par le paradoxe de Russell relatif aux ensembles. Ce paradoxe montre…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  19. 19
  20. 20