Queer In AI: A Case Study in Community-Led Participatory AI

2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency We present Queer in AI as a case study for community-led participatory design in AI. We examine how participatory design and intersectional tenets started and shaped this community's programs over the years. We discuss different...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	QueerInAI, Organizers Of, :, Ovalle, Anaelia, Subramonian, Arjun, Singh, Ashwin, Voelcker, Claas, Sutherland, Danica J, Locatelli, Davide, Breznik, Eva, Klubička, Filip, Yuan, Hang, J, Hetvi, Zhang, Huan, Shriram, Jaidev, Lehman, Kruno, Soldaini, Luca, Sap, Maarten, Deisenroth, Marc Peter, Pacheco, Maria Leonor, Ryskina, Maria, Mundt, Martin, Agarwal, Milind, McLean, Nyx, Xu, Pan, Pranav, A, Korpan, Raj, Ray, Ruchira, Mathew, Sarah, Arora, Sarthak, John, ST, Anand, Tanvi, Agrawal, Vishakha, Agnew, William, Long, Yanan, Wang, Zijie J, Talat, Zeerak, Ghosh, Avijit, Dennler, Nathaniel, Noseworthy, Michael, Jha, Sharvani, Baylor, Emi, Joshi, Aditya, Bilenko, Natalia Y, McNamara, Andrew, Gontijo-Lopes, Raphael, Markham, Alex, Dǒng, Evyn, Kay, Jackie, Saraswat, Manu, Vytla, Nikhil, Stark, Luke
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	08-06-2023
Subjects:	Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence Computer Science - Computers and Society
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency We present Queer in AI as a case study for community-led participatory design in AI. We examine how participatory design and intersectional tenets started and shaped this community's programs over the years. We discuss different challenges that emerged in the process, look at ways this organization has fallen short of operationalizing participatory and intersectional principles, and then assess the organization's impact. Queer in AI provides important lessons and insights for practitioners and theorists of participatory methods broadly through its rejection of hierarchy in favor of decentralization, success at building aid and programs by and for the queer community, and effort to change actors and institutions outside of the queer community. Finally, we theorize how communities like Queer in AI contribute to the participatory design in AI more broadly by fostering cultures of participation in AI, welcoming and empowering marginalized participants, critiquing poor or exploitative participatory practices, and bringing participation to institutions outside of individual research projects. Queer in AI's work serves as a case study of grassroots activism and participatory methods within AI, demonstrating the potential of community-led participatory methods and intersectional praxis, while also providing challenges, case studies, and nuanced insights to researchers developing and using participatory methods.
DOI:	10.48550/arxiv.2303.16972