Study of the Gastrointestinal Tolerance of a New Tablet Formulation of the Lopinavir/Ritonavir Antiretroviral in HIV-Infected Patients

BACKGROUND:Preliminary studies suggest that the new film-coated tablet formulation of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r-fct) could cut down the rate of adverse gastrointestinal symptoms of the conventional lopinavir/ritonavir soft gelatine capsules (LPV/r-sgc). OBJECTIVE:To ascertain the difference in the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) Vol. 50; no. 3; pp. 294 - 298
Main Authors: Sa´ez de la Fuente, Javier, Granja, Virginia, Escobar, Ismael, Collada de la Fuente, Elena, Moreno, Victor, Rubio, Rafael
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hagerstown, MD Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc 01-03-2009
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BACKGROUND:Preliminary studies suggest that the new film-coated tablet formulation of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r-fct) could cut down the rate of adverse gastrointestinal symptoms of the conventional lopinavir/ritonavir soft gelatine capsules (LPV/r-sgc). OBJECTIVE:To ascertain the difference in the rate of adverse gastrointestinal symptoms in patients who switch from LPV/r-sgc to LPV/r-fct. METHODS:An uncontrolled, open, prospective study including a pre/post comparison using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) modified to the characteristics of the protease inhibitors. RESULTS:Seventy patients were included, with a mean time of treatment, with the new formulation of 77 days [confidence interval (CI) 95%70 to 84]. The total GSRS score was 26.96 (CI 95%25.02 to 28.89) in the prechange survey and 26.27 (CI 95%24.08 to 28.47) in the postchange survey, with a mean difference of 0.69 points (CI 95%−1.18 to 2.55, P = 0.47). None of the questions obtained the objective of a difference of at least 2 points, previously set as a clinically significant difference. Only 1 patient dropped the study due to gastrointestinal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS:Our study has unearthed no clinically significant differences in the gastrointestinal tolerance profile of (LPV/r-sgc) and (LPV/r-fct), measuring this tolerance level by application of the GSRS scale.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1525-4135
1944-7884
DOI:10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181989a74