Analysis of the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge

We describe the design and results from the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge. The BraTS Meningioma Challenge differed from prior BraTS Glioma challenges in that it focused on meningiomas, which are typically benign extra-axial tumors with diverse radiologic and anatomical pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LaBella, Dominic, Baid, Ujjwal, Khanna, Omaditya, McBurney-Lin, Shan, McLean, Ryan, Nedelec, Pierre, Rashid, Arif, Tahon, Nourel Hoda, Altes, Talissa, Bhalerao, Radhika, Godfrey, Devon, Floyd, Scott, Janas, Anastasia, Kazerooni, Anahita Fathi, Kofler, Florian, Leu, Kevin, Maleki, Nazanin, Menze, Bjoern, Reitman, Zachary J, Rudie, Jeffrey D, Saluja, Rachit, Wang, Chunhao, Warman, Pranav, Adewole, Maruf, Albrecht, Jake, Anazodo, Udunna, Anwar, Syed Muhammad, Bergquist, Timothy, Chen, Sully Francis, Chung, Verena, Conte, Gian-Marco, Dako, Farouk, Eddy, James, Ezhov, Ivan, Khalili, Nastaran, Iglesias, Juan Eugenio, Jiang, Zhifan, Johanson, Elaine, Van Leemput, Koen, Li, Hongwei Bran, Linguraru, Marius George, Liu, Xinyang, Meier, Zeke, Mongan, John, Piraud, Marie, Shinohara, Russell Takeshi, Abayazeed, Aly H, Akinola, Rachel, Jakab, András, Bilello, Michel, de Verdier, Maria Correia, Davatzikos, Christos, Farahani, Keyvan, Freymann, John, Hess, Christopher, Huang, Raymond, Lohmann, Philipp, Moassefi, Mana, Vollmuth, Phillipp, Sollmann, Nico, Diffley, David, Warren, Daniel I, Fehringer, Pascal, Bronstein, Yulia, Deptula, Lisa, Stein, Evan G, Taherzadeh, Mahsa, de Oliveira, Eduardo Portela, Kontzialis, Marinos, Saba, Luca, Brüßeler, Melanie M. T, Ansari, Shehbaz, Gkampenis, Athanasios, Weiss, David Maximilian, Mansour, Aya, Shawali, Islam H, Yordanov, Nikolay, Stein, Joel M, Hourani, Roula, Moshebah, Mohammed Yahya, Abouelatta, Ahmed Magdy, Willms, Klara, Martin, Dann C, Okar, Abdullah, Taha, Ahmed, Sharifi, Yasaman, Pinho, Marco, Haider, Muhammad Ammar, Aristizabal, Alejandro, Karargyris, Alexandros, Kassem, Hasan, Pati, Sarthak, Alonso-Basanta, Michelle, Villanueva-Meyer, Javier, Nada, Ayman, Aboian, Mariam, Flanders, Adam E, Wiestler, Benedikt, Bakas, Spyridon, Calabrese, Evan
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 15-05-2024
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We describe the design and results from the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge. The BraTS Meningioma Challenge differed from prior BraTS Glioma challenges in that it focused on meningiomas, which are typically benign extra-axial tumors with diverse radiologic and anatomical presentation and a propensity for multiplicity. Nine participating teams each developed deep-learning automated segmentation models using image data from the largest multi-institutional systematically expert annotated multilabel multi-sequence meningioma MRI dataset to date, which included 1000 training set cases, 141 validation set cases, and 283 hidden test set cases. Each case included T2, T2/FLAIR, T1, and T1Gd brain MRI sequences with associated tumor compartment labels delineating enhancing tumor, non-enhancing tumor, and surrounding non-enhancing T2/FLAIR hyperintensity. Participant automated segmentation models were evaluated and ranked based on a scoring system evaluating lesion-wise metrics including dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff Distance. The top ranked team had a lesion-wise median dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.976, 0.976, and 0.964 for enhancing tumor, tumor core, and whole tumor, respectively and a corresponding average DSC of 0.899, 0.904, and 0.871, respectively. These results serve as state-of-the-art benchmarks for future pre-operative meningioma automated segmentation algorithms. Additionally, we found that 1286 of 1424 cases (90.3%) had at least 1 compartment voxel abutting the edge of the skull-stripped image edge, which requires further investigation into optimal pre-processing face anonymization steps.
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2405.09787