Intraosseous device for arthrodesis in foot and ankle surgery: Review of the literature and biomechanical properties
Arthrodesis is the surgical fusion of a diseased joint for the purposes of obtaining pain relief and stability. There have been numerous fixation devices described in literature for foot and ankle arthrodesis, each with their own benefits and drawbacks. To review the use of intraosseous devices in f...
Saved in:
| Published in: | World journal of orthopedics Vol. 12; no. 12; pp. 1036 - 1044 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
United States
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
18-12-2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Arthrodesis is the surgical fusion of a diseased joint for the purposes of obtaining pain relief and stability. There have been numerous fixation devices described in literature for foot and ankle arthrodesis, each with their own benefits and drawbacks.
To review the use of intraosseous devices in foot and ankle surgery.
There were 9 papers included in the review (6 clinical and 3 experimental studies) all evaluating arthrodesis in the foot and ankle using the IOFIX device (Extremity Medical™, Parsippany, NJ, United States). Outcome scores, union rates, as well as complications were analysed.
IOFIX appears to be safe and effective in achieving arthrodesis of the 1
metatarsophalangeal, and talonavicular joints with early rehabilitation. In comparison to plate/screw constructs there were fewer soft tissue complications and issues of metalwork prominence. Cadaveric and biomechanical studies on the use of intramedullary fixation for fusion of the tarsometatarsal and ankle joint showed decreased load to failure, cycles to failure and stiffness in comparison to traditional fusion methods using plates and screws, however IOFIX devices produced higher compressive forces at the joint.
We describe the reasons for which this biomechanical behavior of the intraosseous fixation may be favorable, until prospective and comparative studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up confirm the effectiveness and limitations of the method. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Author contributions: Benjamin B, Ryan P, Chechelnitskaya Y and Syed T performed the preparation of manuscript; Ryan P performed the English language check; Bayam L and Drampalos E helped with collection of data and manuscript preparation. Corresponding author: Efstathios Drampalos, MD, MSc, PhD, Surgeon, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Stirling Road, Larbert FK54WR, Scotland, United Kingdom. efstathios.drampalos2@nhs.scot |
| ISSN: | 2218-5836 2218-5836 |
| DOI: | 10.5312/wjo.v12.i12.1036 |