Monitoring Fatigue During Intermittent Exercise With Accelerometer-Derived Metrics

The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity of accelerometer-derived metrics for monitoring fatigue during an intermittent exercise protocol. Fifteen university students were enrolled in the study (age 20 ± 1 years). A submaximal intermitted recovery test (Sub-IRT) with a duration of 6 min a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in physiology Vol. 10; p. 780
Main Authors: Beato, Marco, De Keijzer, Kevin L, Carty, Benjamin, Connor, Mark
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 26-06-2019
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity of accelerometer-derived metrics for monitoring fatigue during an intermittent exercise protocol. Fifteen university students were enrolled in the study (age 20 ± 1 years). A submaximal intermitted recovery test (Sub-IRT) with a duration of 6 min and 30 s (drill 1) was performed. In order to increase the participants' fatigue, after that, a repeated sprint protocol (1×6 maximal 20 m sprints) was performed. Following that, participants repeated the Sub-IRT (drill 2) to evaluate the external and internal training load (TL) variations related to fatigue. Apex 10 Hz global navigation satellite system (GNSS) units were used to collect the variables total distance (TD), high metabolic distance (HMD), relative velocity (RV), average metabolic power (MP), heart rate maximal (HRmax) and mean (HRmean), muscular (RPEmus) and respiratory rating of perceived exertion (RPEres), dynamic stress load (DSL), and fatigue index (FI). A Bayesian statistical approach was used. A likelihood difference (between drill 1 and drill 2) was found for the following parameters: TD (BF = 0.33, ), HMD (BF = 1.3, ), RV (BF = 0.29, ), MP (BF = 1.3, ), accelerations (BF = 1.6, ), FI (BF = 4.7, ), HRmax (BF = 2.2, ), HRmean (BF = 4.3, ), RPEmus (BF = 11.6, ), RPEres (BF = 3.1, ), DSL (BF = 5.7, ), and DSL•m (BF = 4.3, ). In conclusion, this study reports that DSL, DSL•m , and FI can be valid metrics to monitor fatigue related to movement strategy during a standardized submaximal intermittent exercise protocol.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Francis Degache, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Switzerland
This article was submitted to Exercise Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
Reviewed by: G. Gregory Haff, Edith Cowan University, Australia; Hamdi Chtourou, University of Sfax, Tunisia
ISSN:1664-042X
1664-042X
DOI:10.3389/fphys.2019.00780