PSIV-16 Factors Affecting the Lh Release and Ovulatory Response to a Gnrh Treatment in Lactating Dairy Cows on Day 7 of the Estrous Cycle

PSIV-16 Factors Affecting the Lh Release and Ovulatory Response to a Gnrh Treatment in Lactating Dairy Cows on Day 7 of the Estrous Cycle

Abstract This study evaluated factors affecting LH release and ovulation in response to a treatment with a conventional dose of gonadorelin (GnRH), in lactating dairy cows on day 7 of the estrous cycle. Factors evaluated were: GnRH preparation (ready-to-use vs. lyophilized), body condition score (BC...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of animal science Vol. 101; no. Supplement_3; pp. 590 - 591
Main Authors: Silva, Lucas O e, Alves, Rodrigo L O R, Cavalcanti, Patrícia R, Cortat, Paula R, Dias, Mirela B, Monteiro, Pedro L J, Gonzales, Bruno, Caetano, Heitor D, Hellu, José Abdo A, Wiltbank, Milo C, Sartori, Roberto
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: US Oxford University Press 06-11-2023
Subjects:
Animal health
Animal lactation
Artificial insemination
Cattle
Corpus luteum
Dairy cattle
Estrus cycle
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone
Milk
Ovulation
Synchronism
Synchronization
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasound
Brazil
gonadorelin
luteinizing hormone
ovulation
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract This study evaluated factors affecting LH release and ovulation in response to a treatment with a conventional dose of gonadorelin (GnRH), in lactating dairy cows on day 7 of the estrous cycle. Factors evaluated were: GnRH preparation (ready-to-use vs. lyophilized), body condition score (BCS), parity, days in milk (DIM), milk yield and dominant follicle (DF) diameter, at the time of GnRH treatment. Seven days after an artificial insemination, preceded by a synchronization protocol, lactating Holstein cows were evaluated by ultrasound and those with a corpus luteum (CL) and a DF ≥10 mm were randomly assigned to receive 100 µg GnRH ready-to-use solution (Fertagyl; MSD, Brazil) or lyophilized (Profertil; J.A. Animal Health, Brazil) diluted just before its administration. Overall, 106 cows (BCS = 3.1 ± 0.1; DIM = 96.7 ± 4.2; 39.7 ± 0.7 kg of milk/d) were assigned to GnRH treatments. Ovulation was determined by ultrasound examinations 2 d after GnRH treatment, by disappearance of the DF, and confirmed 5 d later by the presence of an accessory CL. In a subset of cows (n = 33), blood samples were collected just before the GnRH treatment, and 2 and 4 h later, to evaluate circulating P4 and LH concentrations. Data were analyzed by GLIMMIX (SAS 9.4). Treatment effect and its interaction were included in the analyses of all other factors. Differences were declared when P ≤ 0.05 and tendency when 0.053.0 (1.4 ± 0.2 vs 0.7 ± 0.1 ng/mL; Table 1). Moreover, cows with DF ≤12 mm had greater LH peak than cows with DF >12 mm (1.3 ± 0.2 vs. 0.9 ± 0.1 ng/mL; Table 2). However, these factors did not affect ovulation. Neither milk yield nor DIM affected LH peak or ovulation. In conclusion, although no differences were detected on LH peak, primiparous cows on day 7 of the estrous cycle had greater ovulation when treated with Profertil compared with Fertagyl. Moreover, regardless of treatment, greater BCS and larger DF (>12 mm) at the time of GnRH treatment were associated with decreased LH peak, however, without impairing ovulation.
ISSN:0021-8812
1525-3163
DOI:10.1093/jas/skad281.688